Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 vs Apple M4 GPU (10-Core)
55
out 100
VS
33
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070, vs Apple M4 GPU (10-Core). Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 170 113 105 79 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 The Witcher 3 | 191 160 114 61 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 262 207 148 82 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Far Cry 6 | 148 135 112 71 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 120 96 78 43 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 154 141 110 72 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 104 87 74 40 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 133 115 78 34 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 209 194 148 81 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
| 1080p High | 166 | n/a |
| 1080p Ultra | 139 | n/a |
| 1440p Ultra | 107 | n/a |
| 4K Ultra | 63 | n/a |
| Deviation | Low | n/a |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 17825 | n/a |
| Solar Bay | 82645 | n/a |
| Port Royal | 11149 | n/a |
| Fire Strike | 44109 | n/a |
| Night Raid | 152587 | n/a |
| Background Blur | 233 frames/s | 72.2 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 141.7 frames/s | 48.3 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 6.62 Gpix/sec | 1.4 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 9.19 Gpix/sec | 1.94 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 9.2 Gpix/sec | 1.5 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.78 Gpix/sec | 0.53 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 845.4 Gpix/sec | 123.3 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 25043.9 fps | 4938.4 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 1165 | n/a |
| DirectX 11 | 245 fps | n/a |
| DirectX 12 | 102 fps | n/a |
| GPU Compute | 14820 Ops/s | n/a |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 1039 fps | 344.5 fps |
| Car Chase | 900 fps | 259.9 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 761.2 fps | 167.5 fps |
| T-Rex | 3848.1 fps | 914.7 fps |
| ALU 2 | 5980.8 fps | 432.2 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 296.7 fps | 648.6 fps |
| API | OpenGL | Metal |
| OS | Windows | OS X |
| Tessellation | 6200.7 | n/a |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Apple |
| Build | Discrete | Integrated |
| Announced | April, 13, 2023 | May, 7, 2024 |
| Form Factor | PC use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Gaming | Professional |
| Segment | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Apple M GPU |
| Codename | AD104 | Custom |
| Price | 599 | n/a |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 1920 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 2475 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Shader Units | 5888 | 1280 |
| TMUs | 184 | 80 |
| ROPs | 64 | 40 |
| Execution Units | 46 | 160 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | n/a |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | n/a |
| L1 cache | 128 KB/core | n/a |
| L2 cache | 36000 KB/core | n/a |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 158 Gpix/sec | 72 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 455 GTex/s | 144 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 29.1 TFLOPS | 4.6 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | Custom |
| TGP | 200 W | 18 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Max temperature | n/a | 100 °C |
| Transistor Size | 294 mm² | n/a |
| Transistor count | 35 billion | 28 billion |
| Transistor density | 119.05 MTr/mm² | n/a |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR6X | System Shared |
| Memory Frequency | 1313 MHz | 7500 MHz |
| Bus | 192 bit | 128 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 21000 MB/s | 15000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 12 GB | n/a |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | n/a |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | n/a |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | n/a |
| CUDA | 8.9 | n/a |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 3 | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
