Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 vs Nvidia RTX A5000 Laptop
77
out 100
VS
48
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080, vs Nvidia RTX A5000 Laptop. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 231 164 156 120 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 The Witcher 3 | 248 214 157 81 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 312 227 166 84 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Far Cry 6 | 182 160 145 90 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 164 137 106 61 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 215 211 172 115 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 145 126 109 69 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 198 171 122 57 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 287 267 200 108 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
| 1080p High | 220 | n/a |
| 1080p Ultra | 186 | n/a |
| 1440p Ultra | 148 | n/a |
| 4K Ultra | 87 | n/a |
| Deviation | Low | n/a |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 28170 | 9122 |
| Solar Bay | 136727 | 47871 |
| Port Royal | 17959 | 5797 |
| Fire Strike | 64703 | 25416 |
| Night Raid | 183971 | 52161 |
| Background Blur | 250.4 frames/s | 172.7 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 190 frames/s | 103.8 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 9.56 Gpix/sec | 5.34 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 12.8 Gpix/sec | 7.2 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 15.3 Gpix/sec | 5.61 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.97 Gpix/sec | 1.05 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 1130 Gpix/sec | 474.4 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 28795.5 fps | 14218.2 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 1236 | 634 |
| DirectX 11 | 316 fps | 136 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 131 fps | 74 fps |
| GPU Compute | 20847 Ops/s | 7161 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 1476.2 fps | 488.1 fps |
| Car Chase | 1250 fps | 496.6 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 1062.9 fps | 444.8 fps |
| T-Rex | 5492.1 fps | 2214.6 fps |
| ALU 2 | 9330.7 fps | 2778.7 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 291.3 fps | 239.5 fps |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
| Tessellation | 9274.8 | 3343.9 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Announced | September, 20, 2022 | April, 12, 2021 |
| Form Factor | PC use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Gaming | Professional |
| Segment | High-end | High-end |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Codename | AD103 | GA104 |
| Price | 1199 | n/a |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 2205 MHz | 780-1215 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 2505 MHz | 1245-1770 MHz |
| Shader Units | 9728 | 6144 |
| TMUs | 304 | 192 |
| ROPs | 112 | 96 |
| Execution Units | 76 | 48 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 76 | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | 304 | 192 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB/core | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 64 KB/core | 4000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 281 Gpix/sec | 120-170 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 762 GTex/s | 239-340 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 48.7 TFLOPS | 15.3-21.7 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TGP | 320 W | 80-165 W |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Transistor Size | 379 mm² | 392 mm² |
| Transistor count | 45 billion | 17.4 billion |
| Transistor density | 118.73 MTr/mm² | 44.39 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Frequency | 1400 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Bus | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
| Effective Memory Speed | 22400 MB/s | 14000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | 8.9 | 8.6 |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | 1.4a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 3 | DLSS 2 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
