Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) vs Adreno X1-45
49
out 100
VS
24
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB), vs Adreno X1-45. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 159 104 97 69 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 The Witcher 3 | 183 147 107 58 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 259 203 141 82 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Far Cry 6 | 139 129 109 63 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 110 89 70 37 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 136 126 98 63 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 98 81 65 38 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 118 107 71 32 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 183 172 128 73 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
| 1080p High | 154 | n/a |
| 1080p Ultra | 129 | n/a |
| 1440p Ultra | 98 | n/a |
| 4K Ultra | 57 | n/a |
| Deviation | Low | n/a |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 15957 | 927 |
| Solar Bay | 74417 | 5989 |
| Port Royal | 10146 | n/a |
| Fire Strike | 42385 | 3696 |
| Night Raid | 141185 | 16301 |
| Background Blur | 243.1 frames/s | 14.2 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 149.5 frames/s | 6.82 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 5.35 Gpix/sec | 0.56 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 6.88 Gpix/sec | 0.65 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 7.76 Gpix/sec | 0.55 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.57 Gpix/sec | 0.12 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 740.2 Gpix/sec | 26.6 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 22183.7 fps | 1746.7 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 1200 | 343 |
| DirectX 11 | 217 fps | 13 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 86 fps | 7 fps |
| GPU Compute | 12135 Ops/s | 850 Ops/s |
| Image Classification (SP) | 10281 | n/a |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | 29909 | n/a |
| Horizon Detection | 26549 | n/a |
| Face Detection (HP) | 59010 | n/a |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | 117200 | n/a |
| Text Classification (SP) | 3993 | n/a |
| Machine Translation (HP) | 6647 | n/a |
| Object Detection (SP) | 12742 | n/a |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | 44856 | n/a |
| Style Transfer (SP) | 175892 | n/a |
| Framework | ONNX | n/a |
| Backend | DirectML | n/a |
Blender
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Adreno |
| Build | Discrete | Integrated |
| Announced | April, 15, 2025 | October, 24, 2023 |
| Form Factor | PC use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Gaming | Universal |
| Segment | Mid-range | Entry-level |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Adreno X1 |
| Codename | GB206-300 | Adreno X1 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 2407 MHz | 280 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 2572 MHz | 1107-1367 MHz |
| Shader Units | 4608 | 1024 |
| TMUs | 144 | 48 |
| ROPs | 48 | 24 |
| Execution Units | 36 | 3 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | n/a |
| Tensor Cores | 144 | n/a |
| L1 cache | 128 KB/core | 192 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 32000 KB/core | 1000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 123 Gpix/sec | 27-33 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 370 GTex/s | 53-66 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 23.7 TFLOPS | 2.3-2.8 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | IGP |
| TGP | 180 W | 30 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor Size | 263 mm² | n/a |
| Transistor count | 31.1 billion | n/a |
| Transistor density | 118.25 MTr/mm² | n/a |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR7 | System Shared |
| Memory Frequency | 1750 MHz | n/a |
| Bus | 128 bit | n/a |
| ECC support | No | n/a |
| Effective Memory Speed | 28000 MB/s | n/a |
| Memory Size | 16 GB | n/a |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.2 |
| CUDA | 12.0 | n/a |
| DisplayPort | 2.1b | 1.4 |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 4 | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
