Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
73
out 100
VS
44
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 146 94 84 60 |
 The Witcher 3 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 172 142 100 54 |
 Counter-Strike 2 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 239 194 133 77 |
 Far Cry 6 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 129 118 95 56 |
 Hogwarts Legacy | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 95 81 62 31 |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 122 110 82 53 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 88 73 55 33 |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 104 93 56 29 |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 157 149 110 60 |
| 1080p High | n/a | 139 |
| 1080p Ultra | n/a | 117 |
| 1440p Ultra | n/a | 86 |
| 4K Ultra | n/a | 50 |
| Deviation | n/a | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | n/a | 13469 |
| Solar Bay | n/a | 62160 |
| Port Royal | n/a | 8112 |
| Fire Strike | n/a | 34295 |
| Night Raid | n/a | 137720 |
| Background Blur | 266.5 frames/s | 232.6 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 196.9 frames/s | 138.4 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 10.6 Gpix/sec | 4.68 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 15.2 Gpix/sec | 6.06 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 14.4 Gpix/sec | 6.99 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.89 Gpix/sec | 1.6 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 1150 Gpix/sec | 652.6 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 29783 fps | 19534.7 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 1199 | 1067 |
| DirectX 11 | 273 fps | 201 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 142 fps | 90 fps |
| GPU Compute | 15940 Ops/s | 12216 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 1121.9 fps | 725.1 fps |
| Car Chase | 1058.2 fps | 609.6 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 921.3 fps | 484.8 fps |
| T-Rex | 4280.4 fps | 2723.3 fps |
| ALU 2 | n/a | 3299.3 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | n/a | 272.9 fps |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
| Tessellation | n/a | 3381.9 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Announced | January, 6, 2025 | July, 18, 2023 |
| Form Factor | Laptop use | PC use |
| Use case | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | High-end | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Codename | GB203-400 | AD106 |
| Price | n/a | 499 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 990-1515 MHz | 2310 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1515-2160 MHz | 2535 MHz |
| Shader Units | 10496 | 4352 |
| TMUs | 328 | 136 |
| ROPs | 128 | 48 |
| Execution Units | 82 | 34 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82 | 34 |
| Tensor Cores | 328 | 136 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB/core | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 64 KB/core | 32000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 194-276 Gpix/sec | 122 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 497-708 GTex/s | 345 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 31.8-45.3 TFLOPS | 22.1 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| TGP | 95-175 W | 165 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistor Size | 378 mm² | 188 mm² |
| Transistor count | 45.6 billion | 22 billion |
| Transistor density | 120.63 MTr/mm² | 117.02 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Frequency | 1750 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Bus | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 28000 MB/s | 18000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | 10.1 | 8.9 |
| DisplayPort | 2.1a | 1.4a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 4 | DLSS 3 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
