Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090
73
out 100
VS
92
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 277 199 191 154 |
 The Witcher 3 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 288 265 187 100 |
 Counter-Strike 2 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 329 244 185 91 |
 Far Cry 6 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 203 182 167 104 |
 Hogwarts Legacy | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 201 164 132 76 |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 274 258 221 149 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 183 154 137 91 |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 227 208 143 68 |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | n/a n/a n/a n/a | 304 277 215 119 |
| 1080p High | n/a | 254 |
| 1080p Ultra | n/a | 217 |
| 1440p Ultra | n/a | 175 |
| 4K Ultra | n/a | 106 |
| Deviation | n/a | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | n/a | 36322 |
| Solar Bay | n/a | 186930 |
| Port Royal | n/a | 26115 |
| Fire Strike | n/a | 72253 |
| Night Raid | n/a | 195300 |
| Background Blur | 266.5 frames/s | 318.9 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 196.9 frames/s | 222.8 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 10.6 Gpix/sec | 14.2 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 15.2 Gpix/sec | 21 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 14.4 Gpix/sec | 23.9 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.89 Gpix/sec | 2.38 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 1150 Gpix/sec | 1950 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 29783 fps | 48090.4 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 1199 | 1297 |
| DirectX 11 | 273 fps | 329 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 142 fps | 150 fps |
| GPU Compute | 15940 Ops/s | 27111 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 1121.9 fps | 1617.6 fps |
| Car Chase | 1058.2 fps | 1228.6 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 921.3 fps | 1234.6 fps |
| T-Rex | 4280.4 fps | 6286 fps |
| ALU 2 | n/a | 15073.4 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | n/a | 303.7 fps |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
| Tessellation | n/a | 12119.1 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Announced | January, 6, 2025 | September, 20, 2022 |
| Form Factor | Laptop use | PC use |
| Use case | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | High-end | High-end |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Codename | GB203-400 | AD102 |
| Price | n/a | 1599 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 990-1515 MHz | 2235 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1515-2160 MHz | 2520 MHz |
| Shader Units | 10496 | 16384 |
| TMUs | 328 | 512 |
| ROPs | 128 | 176 |
| Execution Units | 82 | 128 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82 | 128 |
| Tensor Cores | 328 | 512 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB/core | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 64 KB/core | 72 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 194-276 Gpix/sec | 444 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 497-708 GTex/s | 1290 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 31.8-45.3 TFLOPS | 82.6 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TGP | 95-175 W | 450 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistor Size | 378 mm² | 609 mm² |
| Transistor count | 45.6 billion | 76.3 billion |
| Transistor density | 120.63 MTr/mm² | 125.29 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR7 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Frequency | 1750 MHz | 2625 MHz |
| Bus | 256 bit | 384 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 28000 MB/s | 21000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | 10.1 | 8.9 |
| DisplayPort | 2.1a | 1.4a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 4 | DLSS 3 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 9
