Intel Arc 130T vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
27
out 100
VS
41
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 130T, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 49 28 17 9 | 120 75 68 45 |
 The Witcher 3 | 39 31 24 11 | 139 110 78 41 |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 43 26 18 10 | 196 151 107 53 |
 Far Cry 6 | 34 29 19 9 | 105 92 73 41 |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 17 13 10 n/a | 73 62 43 22 |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 26 28 20 12 | 91 84 58 38 |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 19 15 10 n/a | 70 58 44 22 |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 22 15 10 n/a | 79 72 45 18 |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 34 31 18 12 | 125 112 80 41 |
| 1080p High | 31 | 111 |
| 1080p Ultra | 24 | 91 |
| 1440p Ultra | 16 | 66 |
| 4K Ultra | 9 | 36 |
| Deviation | High | Low |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 3742 | 10170 |
| Solar Bay | 14696 | 45958 |
| Port Royal | 1902 | 6033 |
| Fire Strike | 9106 | 25661 |
| Night Raid | 41017 | 102512 |
| Background Blur | 70.9 frames/s | 166.7 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 34.9 frames/s | 103.3 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 1.13 Gpix/sec | 4.21 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 1.42 Gpix/sec | 5.56 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 1.96 Gpix/sec | 5.58 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.45 Gpix/sec | 1.17 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 131.5 Gpix/sec | 489.7 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 7360.9 fps | 13242.9 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 881 | 878 |
| DirectX 11 | 42 fps | 150 fps |
| DirectX 12 | 23 fps | 67 fps |
| GPU Compute | 3275 Ops/s | 7619 Ops/s |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | n/a | 575 fps |
| Car Chase | n/a | 513.3 fps |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | n/a | 473.3 fps |
| T-Rex | n/a | 2543.8 fps |
| ALU 2 | n/a | 2749.6 fps |
| Driver Overhead 2 | n/a | 284.1 fps |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
| Tessellation | n/a | 2924.7 |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Nvidia |
| Build | Integrated | Discrete |
| Announced | January, 6, 2025 | July, 9, 2019 |
| Form Factor | Laptop use | PC use |
| Use case | Universal | Gaming |
| Segment | Entry-level | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Xe+ | Turing |
| Codename | Arrow Lake iGPU | TU104 |
| Price | n/a | 499 |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 1605 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 2200 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Shader Units | 896 | 2560 |
| TMUs | 56 | 160 |
| ROPs | 28 | 64 |
| Execution Units | 7 | 40 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 7 | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | No | 320 |
| L1 cache | n/a | 64 KB/core |
| L2 cache | 8000 KB/core | 4000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 62 Gpix/sec | 113 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 123 GTex/s | 283 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 3.9 TFLOPS | 9.1 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| TGP | n/a | 215 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Max temperature | 110 °C | n/a |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 545 mm² |
| Transistor count | n/a | 13 billion |
| Transistor density | n/a | 23.85 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 1750 MHz |
| Bus | n/a | 256 bit |
| ECC support | n/a | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | n/a | 14000 MB/s |
| Memory Size | n/a | 8 GB |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
| Vulkan | n/a | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| CUDA | No | 7.5 |
| DisplayPort | 2.1 | 1.4a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | DLSS 2 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 10
