Intel Arc 130T vs Intel Arc 3 A370M

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 130T, vs Intel Arc 3 A370M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc 130T and Intel Arc 3 A370M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
49
28
17
9
51
28
20
10
The Witcher 3
39
31
24
11
38
29
21
12
Counter-Strike 2
43
26
18
10
44
28
22
n/a
Far Cry 6
34
29
19
9
32
31
21
10
Hogwarts Legacy
17
13
10
n/a
19
12
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
26
28
20
12
29
28
19
12
Ghost of Tsushima
19
15
10
n/a
22
15
13
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
22
15
10
n/a
20
18
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
34
31
18
12
34
30
21
12
Avg FPS
1080p High3132
1080p Ultra2424
1440p Ultra1617
4K Ultra99
DeviationHighLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc 130T
2419
Intel Arc 3 A370M
2998
Time Spy37423439
Solar Bay1469611861
Port Royal1902386
Fire Strike91067957
Night Raid4101735616
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc 130T
36282
Intel Arc 3 A370M
31544
Background Blur70.9 frames/s70.6 frames/s
Face Detection34.9 frames/s32.2 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.13 Gpix/sec0.47 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.42 Gpix/sec1.37 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur1.96 Gpix/sec2.15 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.45 Gpix/sec0.34 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching131.5 Gpix/sec138.8 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics7360.9 fps7194.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc 130T
6127
Intel Arc 3 A370M
5115
G2D Mark881724
DirectX 1142 fps29 fps
DirectX 1223 fps24 fps
GPU Compute3275 Ops/s3014 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc 130T
38.8 fps
Intel Arc 3 A370M
38.2 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a203.7 fps
Car Chasen/a152 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a139.2 fps
T-Rexn/a827.5 fps
ALU 2n/a922 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a153.9 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellationn/a1179

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel Intel
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced January, 6, 2025 March, 30, 2022
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Xe+ Intel Xe-HPG
Codename Arrow Lake iGPU ACM-G11

GPU

GPU Frequency 800 MHz 1150-1550 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2200 MHz 1550-2050 MHz
Shader Units 896 1024
TMUs 56 64
ROPs 28 32
Execution Units 7 128
Ray Tracing Cores 7 8
Tensor Cores No n/a
L1 cache n/a 1536 KB/core
L2 cache 8000 KB/core 4000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 62 Gpix/sec 50-66 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 123 GTex/s 99-131 GTex/s
FLOPS 3.9 TFLOPS 3.2-4.2 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP n/a 35-50 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 5 nm 6 nm
Max temperature 110 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 157 mm²
Transistor count n/a 7.2 billion
Transistor density n/a 45.86 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6
Memory Frequency n/a 1500 MHz
Bus n/a 64 bit
ECC support n/a No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 12000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 4 GB
Max Throughput
Intel Arc 130T
n/a
Intel Arc 3 A370M
96 GB/s

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan n/a 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA No n/a
DisplayPort 2.1 2.0
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below