Intel Arc 140T vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 140T, vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc 140T and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
55
30
21
12
52
31
23
14
The Witcher 3
47
35
26
12
40
31
19
10
Counter-Strike 2
51
37
27
11
71
51
34
13
Far Cry 6
41
34
22
11
43
39
26
14
Hogwarts Legacy
21
15
10
n/a
23
20
14
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
29
30
19
13
33
30
18
12
Ghost of Tsushima
25
16
14
n/a
22
15
13
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
27
24
12
n/a
25
20
12
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
39
36
23
14
43
41
24
13
Avg FPS
1080p High3739
1080p Ultra2931
1440p Ultra1920
4K Ultra1011
DeviationMediumLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc 140T
3445
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3247
Time Spy40033443
Solar Bay14033n/a
Port Royal21116905
Fire Strike91669305
Night Raid3957540408
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc 140T
42502
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
40588
Background Blur90 frames/s74.4 frames/s
Face Detection39.5 frames/s42 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.21 Gpix/sec1.47 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.52 Gpix/sec1.93 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.41 Gpix/sec1.81 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.51 Gpix/sec0.52 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching161.8 Gpix/sec187 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics9155.9 fps5347.1 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc 140T
6812
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
6968
G2D Mark871384
DirectX 1150 fps50 fps
DirectX 1229 fps27 fps
GPU Compute3632 Ops/s2750 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc 140T
47 fps
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
47.5 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)268.2 fps251.1 fps
Car Chase174.6 fps240.5 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)170.5 fps200.6 fps
T-Rex927.1 fps931.9 fps
ALU 21123.4 fps1021.5 fps
Driver Overhead 2153.3 fps270.6 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1452.91151.2

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced January, 6, 2025 April, 15, 2020
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Gaming
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Xe+ Turing
Codename Arrow Lake iGPU TU117

GPU

GPU Frequency 800 MHz 1380 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2250-2350 MHz 1560 MHz
Shader Units 1024 1024
TMUs 64 64
ROPs 32 32
Execution Units 8 16
Ray Tracing Cores 8 No
Tensor Cores No No
L1 cache n/a 64 KB/core
L2 cache 8000 KB/core 1024 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 72-75 Gpix/sec 50 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 144-150 GTex/s 100 GTex/s
FLOPS 4.6-4.8 TFLOPS 3.2 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP n/a 50 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 5 nm 12 nm
Max temperature 110 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 200 mm²
Transistor count n/a 4.7 billion
Transistor density n/a 23.5 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6
Memory Frequency n/a 1500 MHz
Bus n/a 128 bit
ECC support n/a No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 12000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 4 GB
Max Throughput
Intel Arc 140T
n/a
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
192 GB/s

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan n/a 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA No 7.5
DisplayPort 2.1 1.4
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below