Intel Arc 140T vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 140T, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc 140T and Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
55
30
21
12
67
38
28
14
The Witcher 3
47
35
26
12
49
41
28
14
Counter-Strike 2
51
37
27
11
89
60
39
16
Far Cry 6
41
34
22
11
51
46
31
15
Hogwarts Legacy
21
15
10
n/a
30
21
16
9
COD Modern Warfare 3
29
30
19
13
37
30
21
14
Ghost of Tsushima
25
16
14
n/a
28
20
14
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
27
24
12
n/a
30
26
17
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
39
36
23
14
55
49
32
18
Avg FPS
1080p High3748
1080p Ultra2937
1440p Ultra1925
4K Ultra1013
DeviationMediumLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc 140T
3445
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3956
Time Spy40033908
Solar Bay1403319003
Port Royal2111413
Fire Strike916610196
Night Raid3957545167
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc 140T
42502
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
42967
Background Blur90 frames/s73.3 frames/s
Face Detection39.5 frames/s39.7 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.21 Gpix/sec1.65 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.52 Gpix/sec2.13 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.41 Gpix/sec2.06 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.51 Gpix/sec0.55 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching161.8 Gpix/sec191.1 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics9155.9 fps5921.5 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc 140T
6812
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
7774
G2D Mark871481
DirectX 1150 fps48 fps
DirectX 1229 fps42 fps
GPU Compute3632 Ops/s3639 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc 140T
47 fps
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
51 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)268.2 fps262.9 fps
Car Chase174.6 fps255.7 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)170.5 fps207.6 fps
T-Rex927.1 fps950.2 fps
ALU 21123.4 fps1377.4 fps
Driver Overhead 2153.3 fps232.9 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1452.91502.2

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced January, 6, 2025 December, 17, 2021
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Gaming
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Xe+ Ampere
Codename Arrow Lake iGPU GA107

GPU

GPU Frequency 800 MHz 735-1185 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2250-2350 MHz 1245-1477 MHz
Shader Units 1024 2048
TMUs 64 64
ROPs 32 32
Execution Units 8 16
Ray Tracing Cores 8 32
Tensor Cores No 64
L1 cache n/a 64 KB/core
L2 cache 8000 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 72-75 Gpix/sec 40-47 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 144-150 GTex/s 80-95 GTex/s
FLOPS 4.6-4.8 TFLOPS 5.1-6 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 3.0 x8
TGP n/a 30-45 W
Process TSMC Samsung
Process tech. 5 nm 8 nm
Max temperature 110 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 200 mm²
Transistor count n/a 8 billion
Transistor density n/a 40 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6
Memory Frequency n/a 1750 MHz
Bus n/a 64 bit
ECC support n/a No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 14000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 4 GB
Max Throughput
Intel Arc 140T
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
112 GB/s

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan n/a 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA No 8.6
DisplayPort 2.1 1.4a
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 1

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below