Intel Arc 140T vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 140T, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc 140T and Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
55
30
21
12
99
59
49
31
The Witcher 3
47
35
26
12
104
85
60
30
Counter-Strike 2
51
37
27
11
157
116
82
40
Far Cry 6
41
34
22
11
86
74
55
31
Hogwarts Legacy
21
15
10
n/a
57
46
33
15
COD Modern Warfare 3
29
30
19
13
68
60
43
28
Ghost of Tsushima
25
16
14
n/a
52
42
32
19
Cyberpunk 2077
27
24
12
n/a
55
50
29
14
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
39
36
23
14
92
84
59
29
Avg FPS
1080p High3786
1080p Ultra2968
1440p Ultra1949
4K Ultra1026
DeviationMediumLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc 140T
3445
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
7220
Time Spy40037568
Solar Bay1403332396
Port Royal21114447
Fire Strike916619885
Night Raid3957566841
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc 140T
42502
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
92843
Background Blur90 frames/s159 frames/s
Face Detection39.5 frames/s91.2 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.21 Gpix/sec3.67 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.52 Gpix/sec5.1 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.41 Gpix/sec5.03 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.51 Gpix/sec1.08 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching161.8 Gpix/sec411.9 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics9155.9 fps10180.5 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc 140T
6812
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
12357
G2D Mark871602
DirectX 1150 fps111 fps
DirectX 1229 fps41 fps
GPU Compute3632 Ops/s4490 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc 140T
47 fps
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
72.9 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)268.2 fps400.8 fps
Car Chase174.6 fps366.4 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)170.5 fps343.2 fps
T-Rex927.1 fps1640.7 fps
ALU 21123.4 fps1912.9 fps
Driver Overhead 2153.3 fps207 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1452.92107.4

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced January, 6, 2025 January, 29, 2019
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Gaming
Segment Entry-level High-end
Architecture Xe+ Turing
Codename Arrow Lake iGPU TU106B

GPU

GPU Frequency 800 MHz 1215-1305 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2250-2350 MHz 1440-1485 MHz
Shader Units 1024 2304
TMUs 64 144
ROPs 32 64
Execution Units 8 36
Ray Tracing Cores 8 36
Tensor Cores No 288
L1 cache n/a 64 KB/core
L2 cache 8000 KB/core 4000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 72-75 Gpix/sec 92-95 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 144-150 GTex/s 207-214 GTex/s
FLOPS 4.6-4.8 TFLOPS 6.6-6.8 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP n/a 115 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 5 nm 12 nm
Max temperature 110 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 445 mm²
Transistor count n/a 10.8 billion
Transistor density n/a 24.27 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6
Memory Frequency n/a 1750 MHz
Bus n/a 256 bit
ECC support n/a No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 14000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 8 GB
Max Throughput
Intel Arc 140T
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
448 GB/s

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan n/a 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA No 7.5
DisplayPort 2.1 1.4
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No DLSS 2

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below