Intel Arc 140T vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 140T, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc 140T and Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
55
30
21
12
76
45
36
19
The Witcher 3
47
35
26
12
67
53
36
19
Counter-Strike 2
51
37
27
11
113
78
56
21
Far Cry 6
41
34
22
11
58
55
38
21
Hogwarts Legacy
21
15
10
n/a
36
29
20
10
COD Modern Warfare 3
29
30
19
13
46
38
25
16
Ghost of Tsushima
25
16
14
n/a
35
27
21
11
Cyberpunk 2077
27
24
12
n/a
40
36
20
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
39
36
23
14
67
61
40
19
Avg FPS
1080p High3760
1080p Ultra2947
1440p Ultra1932
4K Ultra1016
DeviationMediumLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc 140T
3445
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
4911
Time Spy40034880
Solar Bay1403321611
Port Royal2111552
Fire Strike916612529
Night Raid3957553232
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc 140T
42502
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
58733
Background Blur90 frames/s88.6 frames/s
Face Detection39.5 frames/s57.3 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.21 Gpix/sec2.53 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.52 Gpix/sec3.33 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.41 Gpix/sec2.55 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.51 Gpix/sec0.76 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching161.8 Gpix/sec256.5 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics9155.9 fps7465.5 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc 140T
6812
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
9502
G2D Mark871486
DirectX 1150 fps73 fps
DirectX 1229 fps46 fps
GPU Compute3632 Ops/s3851 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc 140T
47 fps
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
61.4 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)268.2 fps360.1 fps
Car Chase174.6 fps318.7 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)170.5 fps261.5 fps
T-Rex927.1 fps1272.8 fps
ALU 21123.4 fps1563.9 fps
Driver Overhead 2153.3 fps257.6 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1452.91731.1

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced January, 6, 2025 January, 1, 2021
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Gaming
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Xe+ Ampere
Codename Arrow Lake iGPU GA107

GPU

GPU Frequency 800 MHz 712-1530 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2250-2350 MHz 1057-1740 MHz
Shader Units 1024 2048
TMUs 64 64
ROPs 32 40
Execution Units 8 16
Ray Tracing Cores 8 16
Tensor Cores No 64
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache 8000 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 72-75 Gpix/sec 42-70 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 144-150 GTex/s 68-111 GTex/s
FLOPS 4.6-4.8 TFLOPS 4.3-7.1 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP n/a 35-95 W
Process TSMC Samsung
Process tech. 5 nm 8 nm
Max temperature 110 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 200 mm²
Transistor count n/a 8.7 billion
Transistor density n/a 43.5 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6
Memory Frequency n/a 1500 MHz
Bus n/a 128 bit
ECC support n/a No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 12000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 4 GB
Max Throughput
Intel Arc 140T
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
192 GB/s

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan n/a 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA No 8.6
DisplayPort 2.1 1.4a
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No DLSS 2

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below