Intel Arc 140T vs AMD Radeon 680M

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 140T, vs AMD Radeon 680M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc 140T and AMD Radeon 680M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
55
30
21
12
42
23
17
10
The Witcher 3
47
35
26
12
19
21
10
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
51
37
27
11
39
23
20
n/a
Far Cry 6
41
34
22
11
33
27
19
9
Hogwarts Legacy
21
15
10
n/a
18
12
9
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
29
30
19
13
27
24
19
10
Ghost of Tsushima
25
16
14
n/a
19
11
9
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
27
24
12
n/a
19
15
10
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
39
36
23
14
25
24
17
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High3727
1080p Ultra2920
1440p Ultra1914
4K Ultra10-
DeviationMediumLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc 140T
3445
AMD Radeon 680M
2194
Time Spy40032337
Solar Bay1403310075
Port Royal21111022
Fire Strike91666948
Night Raid3957527970
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc 140T
42502
AMD Radeon 680M
28675
Background Blur90 frames/s73.8 frames/s
Face Detection39.5 frames/s30.1 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.21 Gpix/sec0.93 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.52 Gpix/sec1.17 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.41 Gpix/sec1.17 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.51 Gpix/sec0.37 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching161.8 Gpix/sec105 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics9155.9 fps4640 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc 140T
6812
AMD Radeon 680M
4668
G2D Mark871751
DirectX 1150 fps45 fps
DirectX 1229 fps22 fps
GPU Compute3632 Ops/s2163 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc 140T
47 fps
AMD Radeon 680M
27.3 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)268.2 fps142 fps
Car Chase174.6 fpsn/a
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)170.5 fpsn/a
T-Rex927.1 fpsn/a
ALU 21123.4 fpsn/a
Driver Overhead 2153.3 fpsn/a
APIOpenGLVulkan
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1452.9n/a

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced January, 6, 2025 January, 1, 2022
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Xe+ RDNA 2.0
Codename Arrow Lake iGPU Rembrandt

GPU

GPU Frequency 800 MHz 400 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2250-2350 MHz 2200-2400 MHz
Shader Units 1024 768
TMUs 64 48
ROPs 32 32
Execution Units 8 12
Ray Tracing Cores 8 12
Tensor Cores No n/a
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache 8000 KB/core 1024 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 72-75 Gpix/sec 70-77 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 144-150 GTex/s 106-115 GTex/s
FLOPS 4.6-4.8 TFLOPS 3.4-3.7 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP n/a 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 5 nm 6 nm
Max temperature 110 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 208 mm²
Transistor count n/a 13.1 billion
Transistor density n/a 62.98 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
ECC support n/a No

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan n/a 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA No n/a
DisplayPort 2.1 n/a
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
1 (100%)
Total Votes: 1

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below