Intel Arc 140T vs AMD Radeon 780M

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 140T, vs AMD Radeon 780M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc 140T and AMD Radeon 780M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
55
30
21
12
51
26
22
12
The Witcher 3
47
35
26
12
29
25
13
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
51
37
27
11
46
27
19
n/a
Far Cry 6
41
34
22
11
39
31
19
10
Hogwarts Legacy
21
15
10
n/a
20
15
11
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
29
30
19
13
35
29
20
12
Ghost of Tsushima
25
16
14
n/a
20
16
10
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
27
24
12
n/a
20
19
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
39
36
23
14
35
31
18
9
Avg FPS
1080p High3733
1080p Ultra2924
1440p Ultra1916
4K Ultra10-
DeviationMediumLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc 140T
3445
AMD Radeon 780M
2675
Time Spy40032781
Solar Bay1403311162
Port Royal21111580
Fire Strike91667824
Night Raid3957533611
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc 140T
42502
AMD Radeon 780M
32713
Background Blur90 frames/s86.4 frames/s
Face Detection39.5 frames/s35.8 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.21 Gpix/sec1.03 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.52 Gpix/sec1.36 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.41 Gpix/sec1.41 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.51 Gpix/sec0.41 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching161.8 Gpix/sec132.4 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics9155.9 fps4470.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc 140T
6812
AMD Radeon 780M
7001
G2D Mark871878
DirectX 1150 fps67 fps
DirectX 1229 fps31 fps
GPU Compute3632 Ops/s3719 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc 140T
47 fps
AMD Radeon 780M
34.6 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)268.2 fps183.4 fps
Car Chase174.6 fps202.9 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)170.5 fps161.6 fps
T-Rex927.1 fps699.9 fps
ALU 21123.4 fps849.2 fps
Driver Overhead 2153.3 fps268.9 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1452.91373.8

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced January, 6, 2025 January, 4, 2023
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Xe+ RDNA 3.0
Codename Arrow Lake iGPU Phoenix

GPU

GPU Frequency 800 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2250-2350 MHz 2700-2800 MHz
Shader Units 1024 768
TMUs 64 48
ROPs 32 32
Execution Units 8 12
Ray Tracing Cores 8 12
Tensor Cores No n/a
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache 8000 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 72-75 Gpix/sec 86-90 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 144-150 GTex/s 130-134 GTex/s
FLOPS 4.6-4.8 TFLOPS 4.1-4.3 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP n/a 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 5 nm 4 nm
Max temperature 110 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 178 mm²
Transistor count n/a 25.4 billion
Transistor density n/a 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan n/a 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA No n/a
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
10 (55.56%)
8 (44.44%)
Total Votes: 18

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below