Intel Arc 140T vs AMD Radeon 890M

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 140T, vs AMD Radeon 890M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc 140T and AMD Radeon 890M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
55
30
21
12
58
31
27
14
The Witcher 3
47
35
26
12
36
28
15
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
51
37
27
11
53
34
24
10
Far Cry 6
41
34
22
11
46
36
23
12
Hogwarts Legacy
21
15
10
n/a
25
19
15
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
29
30
19
13
40
34
22
15
Ghost of Tsushima
25
16
14
n/a
24
19
12
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
27
24
12
n/a
26
21
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
39
36
23
14
42
37
25
12
Avg FPS
1080p High3739
1080p Ultra2929
1440p Ultra1919
4K Ultra1010
DeviationMediumLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc 140T
3445
AMD Radeon 890M
3224
Time Spy40033373
Solar Bay1403314769
Port Royal21111820
Fire Strike91669007
Night Raid3957539135
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc 140T
42502
AMD Radeon 890M
42932
Background Blur90 frames/s98.6 frames/s
Face Detection39.5 frames/s42 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.21 Gpix/sec1.25 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.52 Gpix/sec1.6 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur2.41 Gpix/sec1.69 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.51 Gpix/sec0.55 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching161.8 Gpix/sec214.8 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics9155.9 fps7757.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc 140T
6812
AMD Radeon 890M
8470
G2D Mark8711006
DirectX 1150 fps77 fps
DirectX 1229 fps37 fps
GPU Compute3632 Ops/s4421 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc 140T
47 fps
AMD Radeon 890M
39.7 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)268.2 fps197.2 fps
Car Chase174.6 fps229.7 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)170.5 fps189.7 fps
T-Rex927.1 fps754.1 fps
ALU 21123.4 fps906.4 fps
Driver Overhead 2153.3 fps251.3 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1452.91577.3

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced January, 6, 2025 June, 3, 2024
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Xe+ RDNA 3+
Codename Arrow Lake iGPU Strix Point

GPU

GPU Frequency 800 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2250-2350 MHz 2900 MHz
Shader Units 1024 1024
TMUs 64 64
ROPs 32 40
Execution Units 8 16
Ray Tracing Cores 8 16
Tensor Cores No n/a
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache 8000 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 72-75 Gpix/sec 116 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 144-150 GTex/s 186 GTex/s
FLOPS 4.6-4.8 TFLOPS 5.9 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP n/a 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 5 nm 4 nm
Max temperature 110 °C 100 °C
Transistor Size n/a 178 mm²
Transistor count n/a 25.4 billion
Transistor density n/a 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan n/a 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA No n/a
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
1 (50%)
1 (50%)
Total Votes: 2

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below