Intel Arc 140V vs Apple M5 GPU (10-Core)
31
out 100
VS
n/a
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 140V, vs Apple M5 GPU (10-Core). Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Time Spy | 3715 | n/a |
| Background Blur | 73.6 frames/s | n/a |
| Face Detection | 39 frames/s | n/a |
| Horizon Detection | 0.79 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Edge Detection | 1.11 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Gaussian Blur | 1.6 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Feature Matching | 0.38 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Stereo Matching | 107.1 Gpix/sec | n/a |
| Particle Physics | 4521.5 fps | n/a |
| API | OpenCL | n/a |
| G2D Mark | 656 | n/a |
| DirectX 11 | 39 fps | n/a |
| DirectX 12 | 25 fps | n/a |
| GPU Compute | 3440 Ops/s | n/a |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 161.8 fps | n/a |
| Car Chase | 132.1 fps | n/a |
| ALU 2 | 764.1 fps | n/a |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 122.5 fps | n/a |
| API | OpenGL | n/a |
| OS | Windows | n/a |
| Tessellation | 998.2 | n/a |
| Image Classification (SP) | n/a | 6348 |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | n/a | 16813 |
| Horizon Detection | n/a | 30322 |
| Face Detection (HP) | n/a | 34387 |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | n/a | 111591 |
| Text Classification (SP) | n/a | 2319 |
| Machine Translation (HP) | n/a | 5555 |
| Object Detection (SP) | n/a | 6450 |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | n/a | 53195 |
| Style Transfer (SP) | n/a | 82314 |
| Framework | n/a | Core ML |
| Backend | n/a | GPU |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | Apple |
| Build | Integrated | Integrated |
| Announced | September, 4, 2024 | October, 15, 2025 |
| Form Factor | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Universal | Professional |
| Segment | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Apple M GPU |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | Custom |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | n/a |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 1950-2050 MHz | 2240 MHz |
| Shader Units | 1024 | 1280 |
| TMUs | n/a | 80 |
| ROPs | n/a | 40 |
| Execution Units | n/a | 160 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | n/a |
| Tensor Cores | No | n/a |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | n/a | 90 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | n/a | 179 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 4-4.2 TFLOPS | 5.7 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | Ring Bus | Custom |
| TGP | 30 W | n/a |
| Process | Intel | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Max temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Transistor count | n/a | 28 billion |
Memory
| Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
| Bus | n/a | 128 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12.2 | n/a |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | n/a |
| CUDA | No | n/a |
| DisplayPort | 2.1 | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Intel Arc 140V the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
