Intel Arc 140V vs AMD Radeon 890M

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc 140V, vs AMD Radeon 890M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc 140V and AMD Radeon 890M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
58
31
27
14
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
36
28
15
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
53
34
24
10
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
46
36
23
12
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
25
19
15
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
40
34
22
15
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
24
19
12
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
26
21
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
42
37
25
12
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a39
1080p Ultran/a29
1440p Ultran/a19
4K Ultran/a10
Deviationn/aLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc 140V
n/a
AMD Radeon 890M
3224
Time Spy37153373
Solar Bayn/a14769
Port Royaln/a1820
Fire Striken/a9007
Night Raidn/a39135
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc 140V
30059
AMD Radeon 890M
42932
Background Blur73.6 frames/s98.6 frames/s
Face Detection39 frames/s42 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.79 Gpix/sec1.25 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.11 Gpix/sec1.6 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur1.6 Gpix/sec1.69 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.38 Gpix/sec0.55 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching107.1 Gpix/sec214.8 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics4521.5 fps7757.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc 140V
5186
AMD Radeon 890M
8470
G2D Mark6561006
DirectX 1139 fps77 fps
DirectX 1225 fps37 fps
GPU Compute3440 Ops/s4421 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc 140V
28.3 fps
AMD Radeon 890M
39.7 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)161.8 fps197.2 fps
Car Chase132.1 fps229.7 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a189.7 fps
T-Rexn/a754.1 fps
ALU 2764.1 fps906.4 fps
Driver Overhead 2122.5 fps251.3 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation998.21577.3

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced September, 4, 2024 June, 3, 2024
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture Xe2 RDNA 3+
Codename Lunar Lake iGPU Strix Point

GPU

GPU Frequency 600 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1950-2050 MHz 2900 MHz
Shader Units 1024 1024
TMUs n/a 64
ROPs n/a 40
Execution Units n/a 16
Ray Tracing Cores 8 16
Tensor Cores No n/a
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache n/a 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate n/a 116 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate n/a 186 GTex/s
FLOPS 4-4.2 TFLOPS 5.9 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 30 W 15 W
Process Intel TSMC
Process tech. 3 nm 4 nm
Max temperature 100 °C 100 °C
Transistor Size n/a 178 mm²
Transistor count n/a 25.4 billion
Transistor density n/a 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
ECC support No n/a

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan n/a 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA No n/a
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below