Intel Arc A380 vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050

Compared 2 processors: Intel Arc A380, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Arc A380 and Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
60
34
24
13
122
74
65
45
The Witcher 3
49
40
27
14
139
109
81
42
Counter-Strike 2
52
37
28
12
198
150
107
56
Far Cry 6
40
36
25
12
103
95
72
39
Hogwarts Legacy
19
16
12
n/a
74
64
44
25
COD Modern Warfare 3
31
31
19
13
90
84
61
38
Ghost of Tsushima
25
20
17
n/a
72
59
41
24
Cyberpunk 2077
26
24
12
n/a
80
72
45
18
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
42
37
26
14
120
113
79
42
Avg FPS
1080p High38111
1080p Ultra3191
1440p Ultra2166
4K Ultra1137
DeviationLowHigh

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Arc A380
3508
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050
10047
Time Spy427910201
Solar Bay1487145966
Port Royal15336128
Fire Strike1042129129
Night Raid49357n/a
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Arc A380
39896
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050
n/a
Background Blur81.3 frames/sn/a
Face Detection38.4 frames/sn/a
Horizon Detection1.18 Gpix/secn/a
Edge Detection1.65 Gpix/secn/a
Gaussian Blur2.45 Gpix/secn/a
Feature Matching0.46 Gpix/secn/a
Stereo Matching146.5 Gpix/secn/a
Particle Physics7107.7 fpsn/a
APIOpenCLn/a
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Arc A380
6225
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050
17775
G2D Mark6051113
DirectX 1138 fps155 fps
DirectX 1234 fps71 fps
GPU Compute2764 Ops/s9063 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Arc A380
47.3 fps
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050
n/a
Aztec Ruins (Normal)268.6 fpsn/a
Car Chase190.4 fpsn/a
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)179 fpsn/a
T-Rex1033.3 fpsn/a
ALU 21103.3 fpsn/a
Driver Overhead 2169.3 fpsn/a
APIOpenGLn/a
OSWindowsn/a
Tessellation1466.6n/a

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Announced January, 14, 2022 June, 24, 2025
Form Factor PC use PC use
Use case Gaming Gaming
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture Generation 12.7 Blackwell 2.0
Codename DG2-128 GB207-300
Price 139 n/a

GPU

GPU Frequency 2000 MHz 2317 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2050 MHz 2572 MHz
Shader Units 1024 2560
TMUs 64 80
ROPs 32 32
Execution Units n/a 20
Ray Tracing Cores 8 20
Tensor Cores 128 80
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache 4000 KB/core 32000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 66 Gpix/sec 82 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 131 GTex/s 206 GTex/s
FLOPS 4.2 TFLOPS 13.2 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 5.0 x8
TGP 75 W 130 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 6 nm 5 nm
Max temperature n/a 87 °C
Transistor Size 157 mm² 149 mm²
Transistor count 7 billion 16.9 billion
Transistor density 44.59 MTr/mm² 113.42 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Frequency 1937 MHz 1750 MHz
Bus 96 bit 128 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed 15500 MB/s 20000 MB/s
Memory Size 6 GB 8 GB
Max Throughput
Intel Arc A380
186 GB/s
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050
320 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12.2
Vulkan 1.3 1.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA n/a 12.0
DisplayPort 2.0 2.1b
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No DLSS 4

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below