Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) vs AMD Radeon 760M

Compared 2 processors: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU), vs AMD Radeon 760M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) and AMD Radeon 760M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
22
9
n/a
n/a
44
21
18
9
The Witcher 3
12
11
n/a
n/a
21
17
10
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
18
12
10
n/a
40
25
18
9
Far Cry 6
14
11
n/a
n/a
33
25
17
9
COD Modern Warfare 3
13
11
10
n/a
30
28
17
11
Ghost of Tsushima
9
n/a
n/a
n/a
18
11
10
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
19
16
9
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
13
13
9
n/a
27
23
13
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
18
13
10
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High1328
1080p Ultra1020
1440p Ultra-14
4K Ultra--
DeviationHighMedium

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
934
AMD Radeon 760M
2105
Time Spy12302414
Solar Bayn/a9608
Port Royaln/a970
Fire Strike41967232
Night Raid1497728004
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
14240
AMD Radeon 760M
22589
Background Blur31 frames/s57.8 frames/s
Face Detection23.3 frames/s28.7 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.61 Gpix/sec0.8 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection0.87 Gpix/sec1 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.36 Gpix/sec0.82 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.15 Gpix/sec0.29 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching36.1 Gpix/sec85.4 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics2493.2 fps2844.5 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
2668
AMD Radeon 760M
5640
G2D Mark382900
DirectX 1116 fps56 fps
DirectX 1213 fps26 fps
GPU Compute1285 Ops/s3005 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
26.9 fps
AMD Radeon 760M
23.1 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)174.8 fps125.5 fps
Car Chasen/a132.4 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a106.9 fps
T-Rexn/a463 fps
APIVulkanOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced August, 15, 2020 January, 4, 2023
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Generation 12.1 RDNA 3.0
Codename Tiger Lake GT2 Phoenix

GPU

GPU Frequency 300 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 850-1500 MHz 2600-2800 MHz
Shader Units 640 512
TMUs 40 32
ROPs 20 16
Execution Units 80 8
Ray Tracing Cores No 6
Tensor Cores No n/a
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 17-30 Gpix/sec 42-45 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 34-60 GTex/s 83-90 GTex/s
FLOPS 1.1-1.9 TFLOPS 2.7-2.9 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 15 W 15 W
Process Intel TSMC
Process tech. 10 nm 4 nm
Transistor Size 146 mm² 178 mm²
Transistor count n/a 25.4 billion
Transistor density n/a 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
ECC support No n/a

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
DisplayPort n/a 2.1
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below