Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) vs AMD Radeon 740M

Compared 2 processors: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU), vs AMD Radeon 740M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) and AMD Radeon 740M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
21
10
n/a
n/a
30
13
13
n/a
The Witcher 3
13
10
n/a
n/a
11
12
n/a
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
20
11
9
n/a
29
18
13
n/a
Far Cry 6
14
11
n/a
n/a
23
18
11
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
13
n/a
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
13
11
10
n/a
22
20
15
9
Ghost of Tsushima
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
13
n/a
n/a
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
11
9
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
13
11
9
n/a
19
17
12
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High1319
1080p Ultra914
1440p Ultra-10
4K Ultra--
DeviationLowHigh

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
882
AMD Radeon 740M
1421
Time Spy12911645
Solar Bayn/a5823
Port Royaln/a722
Fire Strike44705118
Night Raid1422821927
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
17326
AMD Radeon 740M
12774
Background Blur34.5 frames/s31.6 frames/s
Face Detection27.4 frames/s15.3 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.75 Gpix/sec0.44 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.11 Gpix/sec0.56 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.39 Gpix/sec0.47 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.18 Gpix/sec0.17 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching55.6 Gpix/sec47 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics3061.7 fps1815.3 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
n/a
AMD Radeon 740M
3212
G2D Markn/a810
DirectX 11n/a27 fps
DirectX 12n/a18 fps
GPU Computen/a1756 Ops/s

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced August, 15, 2020 January, 4, 2023
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Generation 12.1 RDNA 3.0
Codename Tiger Lake GT2 Phoenix

GPU

GPU Frequency 300 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 950-1550 MHz 2500-2800 MHz
Shader Units 768 256
TMUs 48 16
ROPs 24 8
Execution Units 96 4
Ray Tracing Cores No 4
Tensor Cores No n/a
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 23-37 Gpix/sec 20-22 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 46-74 GTex/s 40-45 GTex/s
FLOPS 1.5-2.4 TFLOPS 1.3-1.4 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 15 W 15 W
Process Intel TSMC
Process tech. 10 nm 4 nm
Max temperature n/a 95 °C
Transistor Size 146 mm² 178 mm²
Transistor count n/a 25.4 billion
Transistor density n/a 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
ECC support No No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
DisplayPort n/a 2.1
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below