Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) vs AMD Radeon 780M

Compared 2 processors: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU), vs AMD Radeon 780M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) and AMD Radeon 780M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
21
10
n/a
n/a
51
26
22
12
The Witcher 3
13
10
n/a
n/a
29
25
13
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
20
11
9
n/a
46
27
19
n/a
Far Cry 6
14
11
n/a
n/a
39
31
19
10
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
15
11
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
13
11
10
n/a
35
29
20
12
Ghost of Tsushima
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
16
10
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
19
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
13
11
9
n/a
35
31
18
9
Avg FPS
1080p High1333
1080p Ultra924
1440p Ultra-16
4K Ultra--
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
882
AMD Radeon 780M
2675
Time Spy12912781
Solar Bayn/a11162
Port Royaln/a1580
Fire Strike44707824
Night Raid1422833611
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
17326
AMD Radeon 780M
32713
Background Blur34.5 frames/s86.4 frames/s
Face Detection27.4 frames/s35.8 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.75 Gpix/sec1.03 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.11 Gpix/sec1.36 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.39 Gpix/sec1.41 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.18 Gpix/sec0.41 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching55.6 Gpix/sec132.4 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics3061.7 fps4470.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
n/a
AMD Radeon 780M
7001
G2D Markn/a878
DirectX 11n/a67 fps
DirectX 12n/a31 fps
GPU Computen/a3719 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
n/a
AMD Radeon 780M
34.6 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a183.4 fps
Car Chasen/a202.9 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a161.6 fps
T-Rexn/a699.9 fps
ALU 2n/a849.2 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a268.9 fps
APIn/aOpenGL
OSn/aWindows
Tessellationn/a1373.8

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced August, 15, 2020 January, 4, 2023
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Generation 12.1 RDNA 3.0
Codename Tiger Lake GT2 Phoenix

GPU

GPU Frequency 300 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 950-1550 MHz 2700-2800 MHz
Shader Units 768 768
TMUs 48 48
ROPs 24 32
Execution Units 96 12
Ray Tracing Cores No 12
Tensor Cores No n/a
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 23-37 Gpix/sec 86-90 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 46-74 GTex/s 130-134 GTex/s
FLOPS 1.5-2.4 TFLOPS 4.1-4.3 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 15 W 15 W
Process Intel TSMC
Process tech. 10 nm 4 nm
Transistor Size 146 mm² 178 mm²
Transistor count n/a 25.4 billion
Transistor density n/a 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
ECC support No n/a

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
DisplayPort n/a 2.1
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
3 (100%)
Total Votes: 3

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below