Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Nvidia GeForce MX350

Compared 2 processors: Intel UHD Graphics 620, vs Nvidia GeForce MX350. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel UHD Graphics 620 and Nvidia GeForce MX350
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
9
n/a
n/a
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
32
17
12
n/a
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
17
15
n/a
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
14
n/a
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
24
19
14
9
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
13
n/a
n/a
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a15
1080p Ultran/a9
1440p Ultran/a-
4K Ultran/a-
Deviationn/aHigh

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel UHD Graphics 620
327
Nvidia GeForce MX350
956
Time Spy3611233
Fire Strike11554206
Night Raid510417129
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel UHD Graphics 620
5288
Nvidia GeForce MX350
15572
Background Blur10.4 frames/s40 frames/s
Face Detection6.19 frames/s18.9 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.19 Gpix/sec0.59 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection0.27 Gpix/sec0.88 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.18 Gpix/sec0.97 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.07 Gpix/sec0.15 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching20.8 Gpix/sec45.1 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics769 fps1531.6 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel UHD Graphics 620
1042
Nvidia GeForce MX350
2811
G2D Mark241237
DirectX 118 fps21 fps
DirectX 125 fps15 fps
GPU Compute442 Ops/s1245 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel UHD Graphics 620
5.6 fps
Nvidia GeForce MX350
19.1 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)35.2 fps112.8 fps
Car Chasen/a110.2 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a99 fps
T-Rexn/a460 fps
ALU 2n/a472.3 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a195.3 fps
APIVulkanOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellationn/a584.6

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced August, 28, 2018 February, 10, 2020
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Gaming
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Generation 9.5 Pascal
Codename Whiskey Lake GT2 GP107

GPU

GPU Frequency 300 MHz 747-1354 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1000-1150 MHz 936-1468 MHz
Shader Units 192 640
TMUs 24 32
ROPs 3 16
Execution Units 24 5
Ray Tracing Cores n/a No
Tensor Cores n/a No
L1 cache n/a 48 KB/core
L2 cache n/a 512 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 3 Gpix/sec 15-23 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 24-28 GTex/s 30-47 GTex/s
FLOPS 0.4 TFLOPS 1.2-1.9 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 3.0 x4
TGP 15 W 15-30 W
Process Intel Samsung
Process tech. 14 nm 14 nm
Transistor Size 49 mm² 132 mm²
Transistor count 0.19 billion 3.3 billion
Transistor density 3.88 MTr/mm² 25 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR5
Memory Frequency n/a 1752 MHz
Bus n/a 64 bit
ECC support No n/a
Effective Memory Speed n/a 7000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 2 GB
Max Throughput
Intel UHD Graphics 620
n/a
Nvidia GeForce MX350
56 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.1.103 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA n/a 6.1
DisplayPort 1.2 1.4
Ray Tracing No No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
1 (100%)
Total Votes: 1

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below