Intel UHD Graphics (64 EU) vs Nvidia GeForce MX350

Compared 2 processors: Intel UHD Graphics (64 EU), vs Nvidia GeForce MX350. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel UHD Graphics (64 EU) and Nvidia GeForce MX350
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
20
9
n/a
n/a
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
The Witcher 3
11
9
n/a
n/a
9
n/a
n/a
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
15
10
9
n/a
32
17
12
n/a
Far Cry 6
12
9
n/a
n/a
17
15
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
11
9
9
n/a
24
19
14
9
Ghost of Tsushima
9
n/a
n/a
n/a
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
12
9
n/a
n/a
13
n/a
n/a
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
14
n/a
n/a
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High1115
1080p Ultra-9
1440p Ultra--
4K Ultra--
DeviationMediumHigh

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel UHD Graphics (64 EU)
792
Nvidia GeForce MX350
956
Time Spy10781233
Fire Strike34974206
Night Raid1368117129
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel UHD Graphics (64 EU)
12607
Nvidia GeForce MX350
15572
Background Blur27.6 frames/s40 frames/s
Face Detection19.2 frames/s18.9 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.52 Gpix/sec0.59 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection0.76 Gpix/sec0.88 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.37 Gpix/sec0.97 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.14 Gpix/sec0.15 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching33 Gpix/sec45.1 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics2055.2 fps1531.6 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel UHD Graphics (64 EU)
n/a
Nvidia GeForce MX350
2811
G2D Markn/a237
DirectX 11n/a21 fps
DirectX 12n/a15 fps
GPU Computen/a1245 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel UHD Graphics (64 EU)
n/a
Nvidia GeForce MX350
19.1 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a112.8 fps
Car Chasen/a110.2 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a99 fps
T-Rexn/a460 fps
ALU 2n/a472.3 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a195.3 fps
APIn/aOpenGL
OSn/aWindows
Tessellationn/a584.6

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced January, 4, 2022 February, 10, 2020
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Gaming
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Xe architecture (Gen12) Pascal
Codename Alder Lake GT1 GP107

GPU

GPU Frequency 300 MHz 747-1354 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 850-1500 MHz 936-1468 MHz
Shader Units 512 640
TMUs 32 32
ROPs 16 16
Execution Units 64 5
Ray Tracing Cores No No
Tensor Cores No No
L1 cache n/a 48 KB/core
L2 cache 1024 KB/core 512 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 14-24 Gpix/sec 15-23 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 27-48 GTex/s 30-47 GTex/s
FLOPS 0.9-1.5 TFLOPS 1.2-1.9 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 3.0 x4
TGP 15 W 15-30 W
Process Intel Samsung
Process tech. 10 nm 14 nm
Transistor Size n/a 132 mm²
Transistor count n/a 3.3 billion
Transistor density n/a 25 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR5
Memory Frequency n/a 1752 MHz
Bus n/a 64 bit
ECC support No n/a
Effective Memory Speed n/a 7000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 2 GB
Max Throughput
Intel UHD Graphics (64 EU)
n/a
Nvidia GeForce MX350
56 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA n/a 6.1
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4
Ray Tracing No No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below