Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU) vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 8

Compared 2 processors: Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU), vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 8. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU) and AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
24
12
9
n/a
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
9
11
n/a
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
27
17
12
n/a
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
19
17
10
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
20
15
13
n/a
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
9
n/a
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
15
15
10
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a16
1080p Ultran/a12
1440p Ultran/a9
4K Ultran/a-
Deviationn/aLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU)
554
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
1248
Time Spy7471413
Fire Strike23524515
Night Raid999817937
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU)
8198
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
10472
Background Blur18.4 frames/s21.2 frames/s
Face Detection10.7 frames/s10.9 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.3 Gpix/sec0.34 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection0.47 Gpix/sec0.65 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.3 Gpix/sec0.51 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.1 Gpix/sec0.13 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching21.5 Gpix/sec34.9 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics1269.5 fps1322.9 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU)
n/a
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
1580
G2D Markn/a409
DirectX 11n/a10 fps
DirectX 12n/a8 fps
GPU Computen/a874 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EU)
n/a
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
12.4 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a77 fps
Car Chasen/a68.4 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a58.9 fps
T-Rexn/a293.7 fps
ALU 2n/a318 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a98.4 fps
APIn/aOpenGL
OSn/aWindows
Tessellationn/a340.4

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced August, 15, 2020 February, 13, 2018
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Generation 12.1 GCN 5.0
Codename Tiger Lake GT2 Raven

GPU

GPU Frequency 400 MHz 300 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 800-1400 MHz 1100-2100 MHz
Shader Units 384 512
TMUs 24 32
ROPs 12 8
Execution Units 48 8
Ray Tracing Cores No No
Tensor Cores No No
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 10-17 Gpix/sec 9-17 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 19-34 GTex/s 35-67 GTex/s
FLOPS 0.6-1.1 TFLOPS 1.1-2.2 TFLOPS

Process

Interface Ring Bus IGP
TGP 15 W 15 W
Process Intel TSMC
Process tech. 10 nm 7 nm
Transistor Size 146 mm² 210 mm²
Transistor count n/a 4.94 billion
Transistor density n/a 23.52 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
ECC support No No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Ray Tracing No No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
1 (100%)
Total Votes: 1

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below