AMD Radeon 660M vs Intel UHD Graphics 620

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 660M, vs Intel UHD Graphics 620. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon 660M and Intel UHD Graphics 620
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
27
13
11
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
The Witcher 3
10
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
24
18
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Far Cry 6
22
18
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
20
16
13
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Ghost of Tsushima
12
9
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
9
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
15
14
11
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High17n/a
1080p Ultra13n/a
1440p Ultra9n/a
4K Ultra-n/a
DeviationLown/a

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon 660M
1350
Intel UHD Graphics 620
327
Time Spy1532361
Solar Bay6227n/a
Port Royal613n/a
Fire Strike49061155
Night Raid201965104
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon 660M
14065
Intel UHD Graphics 620
5288
Background Blur36 frames/s10.4 frames/s
Face Detection16.4 frames/s6.19 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.48 Gpix/sec0.19 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection0.65 Gpix/sec0.27 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.53 Gpix/sec0.18 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.18 Gpix/sec0.07 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching46.5 Gpix/sec20.8 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics2056.5 fps769 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon 660M
4461
Intel UHD Graphics 620
1042
G2D Mark701241
DirectX 1192 fps8 fps
DirectX 1245 fps5 fps
GPU Compute1972 Ops/s442 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon 660M
18.1 fps
Intel UHD Graphics 620
5.6 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)109.1 fps35.2 fps
Car Chase106.4 fpsn/a
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)87.7 fpsn/a
T-Rex368.5 fpsn/a
ALU 2451.3 fpsn/a
Driver Overhead 2170.1 fpsn/a
APIOpenGLVulkan
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation320.9n/a

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced January, 1, 2022 August, 28, 2018
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Generation 9.5
Codename Rembrandt Whiskey Lake GT2

GPU

GPU Frequency 400 MHz 300 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1800-1900 MHz 1000-1150 MHz
Shader Units 384 192
TMUs 24 24
ROPs 16 3
Execution Units 6 24
Ray Tracing Cores 6 n/a
L1 cache 128 KB/core n/a
L2 cache 1024 KB/core n/a
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 29-30 Gpix/sec 3 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 43-46 GTex/s 24-28 GTex/s
FLOPS 1.4-1.5 TFLOPS 0.4 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Ring Bus
TGP 15 W 15 W
Process TSMC Intel
Process tech. 6 nm 14 nm
Transistor Size 208 mm² 49 mm²
Transistor count 13.1 billion 0.19 billion
Transistor density 62.98 MTr/mm² 3.88 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
ECC support No No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.1.103
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
DisplayPort n/a 1.2
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below