AMD Radeon 660M vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 8

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 660M, vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 8. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon 660M and AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
27
13
11
n/a
24
12
9
n/a
The Witcher 3
10
12
n/a
n/a
9
11
n/a
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
24
18
12
n/a
27
17
12
n/a
Far Cry 6
22
18
10
n/a
19
17
10
n/a
Hogwarts Legacy
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
20
16
13
n/a
20
15
13
n/a
Ghost of Tsushima
12
9
n/a
n/a
12
n/a
n/a
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
9
10
n/a
n/a
9
n/a
n/a
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
15
14
11
n/a
15
15
10
n/a
Avg FPS
1080p High1716
1080p Ultra1312
1440p Ultra99
4K Ultra--
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon 660M
1350
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
1248
Time Spy15321413
Solar Bay6227n/a
Port Royal613n/a
Fire Strike49064515
Night Raid2019617937
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon 660M
14065
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
10472
Background Blur36 frames/s21.2 frames/s
Face Detection16.4 frames/s10.9 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.48 Gpix/sec0.34 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection0.65 Gpix/sec0.65 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.53 Gpix/sec0.51 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.18 Gpix/sec0.13 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching46.5 Gpix/sec34.9 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics2056.5 fps1322.9 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon 660M
4461
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
1580
G2D Mark701409
DirectX 1192 fps10 fps
DirectX 1245 fps8 fps
GPU Compute1972 Ops/s874 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon 660M
18.1 fps
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
12.4 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)109.1 fps77 fps
Car Chase106.4 fps68.4 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)87.7 fps58.9 fps
T-Rex368.5 fps293.7 fps
ALU 2451.3 fps318 fps
Driver Overhead 2170.1 fps98.4 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation320.9340.4

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced January, 1, 2022 February, 13, 2018
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 2.0 GCN 5.0
Codename Rembrandt Raven

GPU

GPU Frequency 400 MHz 300 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 1800-1900 MHz 1100-2100 MHz
Shader Units 384 512
TMUs 24 32
ROPs 16 8
Execution Units 6 8
Ray Tracing Cores 6 No
Tensor Cores n/a No
L1 cache 128 KB/core n/a
L2 cache 1024 KB/core n/a
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 29-30 Gpix/sec 9-17 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 43-46 GTex/s 35-67 GTex/s
FLOPS 1.4-1.5 TFLOPS 1.1-2.2 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 IGP
TGP 15 W 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 6 nm 7 nm
Transistor Size 208 mm² 210 mm²
Transistor count 13.1 billion 4.94 billion
Transistor density 62.98 MTr/mm² 23.52 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared
ECC support No No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below