AMD Radeon 760M vs AMD Radeon 780M

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 760M, vs AMD Radeon 780M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon 760M and AMD Radeon 780M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
44
21
18
9
51
26
22
12
The Witcher 3
21
17
10
n/a
29
25
13
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
40
25
18
9
46
27
19
n/a
Far Cry 6
33
25
17
9
39
31
19
10
Hogwarts Legacy
18
13
10
n/a
20
15
11
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
30
28
17
11
35
29
20
12
Ghost of Tsushima
18
11
10
n/a
20
16
10
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
19
16
9
n/a
20
19
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
27
23
13
n/a
35
31
18
9
Avg FPS
1080p High2833
1080p Ultra2024
1440p Ultra1416
4K Ultra--
DeviationMediumLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon 760M
2105
AMD Radeon 780M
2675
Time Spy24142781
Solar Bay960811162
Port Royal9701580
Fire Strike72327824
Night Raid2800433611
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon 760M
22589
AMD Radeon 780M
32713
Background Blur57.8 frames/s86.4 frames/s
Face Detection28.7 frames/s35.8 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.8 Gpix/sec1.03 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1 Gpix/sec1.36 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.82 Gpix/sec1.41 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.29 Gpix/sec0.41 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching85.4 Gpix/sec132.4 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics2844.5 fps4470.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon 760M
5640
AMD Radeon 780M
7001
G2D Mark900878
DirectX 1156 fps67 fps
DirectX 1226 fps31 fps
GPU Compute3005 Ops/s3719 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon 760M
23.1 fps
AMD Radeon 780M
34.6 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)125.5 fps183.4 fps
Car Chase132.4 fps202.9 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)106.9 fps161.6 fps
T-Rex463 fps699.9 fps
ALU 2n/a849.2 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a268.9 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellationn/a1373.8

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced January, 4, 2023 January, 4, 2023
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 3.0 RDNA 3.0
Codename Phoenix Phoenix

GPU

GPU Frequency 800 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2600-2800 MHz 2700-2800 MHz
Shader Units 512 768
TMUs 32 48
ROPs 16 32
Execution Units 8 12
Ray Tracing Cores 6 12
L1 cache 128 KB/core 128 KB/core
L2 cache 2000 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 42-45 Gpix/sec 86-90 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 83-90 GTex/s 130-134 GTex/s
FLOPS 2.7-2.9 TFLOPS 4.1-4.3 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 15 W 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 4 nm 4 nm
Transistor Size 178 mm² 178 mm²
Transistor count 25.4 billion 25.4 billion
Transistor density 142.7 MTr/mm² 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
2 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 2

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below