AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon 890M

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 780M, vs AMD Radeon 890M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon 780M and AMD Radeon 890M
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
51
26
22
12
58
31
27
14
The Witcher 3
29
25
13
n/a
36
28
15
n/a
Counter-Strike 2
46
27
19
n/a
53
34
24
10
Far Cry 6
39
31
19
10
46
36
23
12
Hogwarts Legacy
20
15
11
n/a
25
19
15
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
35
29
20
12
40
34
22
15
Ghost of Tsushima
20
16
10
n/a
24
19
12
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
20
19
11
n/a
26
21
11
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
35
31
18
9
42
37
25
12
Avg FPS
1080p High3339
1080p Ultra2429
1440p Ultra1619
4K Ultra-10
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon 780M
2675
AMD Radeon 890M
3224
Time Spy27813373
Solar Bay1116214769
Port Royal15801820
Fire Strike78249007
Night Raid3361139135
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon 780M
32713
AMD Radeon 890M
42932
Background Blur86.4 frames/s98.6 frames/s
Face Detection35.8 frames/s42 frames/s
Horizon Detection1.03 Gpix/sec1.25 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.36 Gpix/sec1.6 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur1.41 Gpix/sec1.69 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.41 Gpix/sec0.55 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching132.4 Gpix/sec214.8 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics4470.7 fps7757.7 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon 780M
7001
AMD Radeon 890M
8470
G2D Mark8781006
DirectX 1167 fps77 fps
DirectX 1231 fps37 fps
GPU Compute3719 Ops/s4421 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon 780M
34.6 fps
AMD Radeon 890M
39.7 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)183.4 fps197.2 fps
Car Chase202.9 fps229.7 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)161.6 fps189.7 fps
T-Rex699.9 fps754.1 fps
ALU 2849.2 fps906.4 fps
Driver Overhead 2268.9 fps251.3 fps
APIOpenGLOpenGL
OSWindowsWindows
Tessellation1373.81577.3

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD AMD
Build Integrated Integrated
Announced January, 4, 2023 June, 3, 2024
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Universal
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 3.0 RDNA 3+
Codename Phoenix Strix Point

GPU

GPU Frequency 800 MHz 800 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2700-2800 MHz 2900 MHz
Shader Units 768 1024
TMUs 48 64
ROPs 32 40
Execution Units 12 16
Ray Tracing Cores 12 16
L1 cache 128 KB/core 128 KB/core
L2 cache 2000 KB/core 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 86-90 Gpix/sec 116 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 130-134 GTex/s 186 GTex/s
FLOPS 4.1-4.3 TFLOPS 5.9 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 15 W 15 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 4 nm 4 nm
Max temperature n/a 100 °C
Transistor Size 178 mm² 178 mm²
Transistor count 25.4 billion 25.4 billion
Transistor density 142.7 MTr/mm² 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared System Shared

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below