AMD Radeon 840M vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 840M, vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon 840M and Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
92
53
45
27
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
89
73
51
28
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
143
100
71
34
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
75
66
51
25
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
49
40
29
14
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
59
50
35
23
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
47
34
25
13
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
49
45
26
10
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
82
73
52
25
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a76
1080p Ultran/a59
1440p Ultran/a43
4K Ultran/a22
Deviationn/aLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
6332
Time Spyn/a6227
Solar Bayn/a30015
Port Royaln/a3542
Fire Striken/a15972
Night Raidn/a74372
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
67028
Background Blurn/a110.4 frames/s
Face Detectionn/a64.4 frames/s
Horizon Detectionn/a2.87 Gpix/sec
Edge Detectionn/a3.76 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blurn/a2.89 Gpix/sec
Feature Matchingn/a0.81 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matchingn/a270.9 Gpix/sec
Particle Physicsn/a9339.7 fps
APIn/aOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
12610
G2D Markn/a918
DirectX 11n/a91 fps
DirectX 12n/a59 fps
GPU Computen/a6528 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
71.7 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a393.8 fps
Car Chasen/a361.9 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a294.2 fps
T-Rexn/a1381.8 fps
ALU 2n/a1974.1 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a286.3 fps
APIn/aOpenGL
OSn/aWindows
Tessellationn/a2081.3

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced January, 7, 2025 January, 27, 2022
Form Factor Laptop use PC use
Use case Universal Gaming
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 3.5 Ampere
Codename Krackan Point GA106
Price n/a 249

GPU

GPU Frequency n/a 1552 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2900 MHz 1777 MHz
Shader Units 256 2560
TMUs 16 80
ROPs 8 32
Execution Units 4 20
Ray Tracing Cores 4 20
Tensor Cores n/a 80
L1 cache n/a 128 KB/core
L2 cache n/a 2000 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 4 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 23 Gpix/sec 57 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 46 GTex/s 142 GTex/s
FLOPS 3 TFLOPS 9.1 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 15-54 W 130 W
Process TSMC Samsung
Process tech. 4 nm 8 nm
Max temperature 100 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 276 mm²
Transistor count n/a 12 billion
Transistor density n/a 43.48 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6
Memory Frequency n/a 1750 MHz
Bus n/a 128 bit
ECC support n/a No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 14000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 8 GB
Max Throughput
AMD Radeon 840M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
224 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA n/a 8.6
DisplayPort 2.1 1.4a
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No DLSS 2

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below