AMD Radeon 840M vs AMD Radeon 610M
34
out 100
VS
23
out 100
Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 840M, vs AMD Radeon 610M. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| Time Spy | n/a | 522 |
| Solar Bay | n/a | 2152 |
| Port Royal | n/a | 308 |
| Fire Strike | n/a | 1805 |
| Night Raid | n/a | 7584 |
| Background Blur | n/a | 12 frames/s |
| Face Detection | n/a | 6.42 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | n/a | 0.16 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | n/a | 0.23 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | n/a | 0.16 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | n/a | 0.07 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | n/a | 18.2 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | n/a | 828.6 fps |
| API | n/a | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | n/a | 526 |
| DirectX 11 | n/a | 16 fps |
| DirectX 12 | n/a | 6 fps |
| GPU Compute | n/a | 702 Ops/s |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Build | Integrated | Integrated |
| Announced | January, 7, 2025 | October, 1, 2022 |
| Form Factor | Laptop use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Universal | Universal |
| Segment | Entry-level | Entry-level |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Codename | Krackan Point | Mendocino |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 400 MHz |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 2900 MHz | 1900-2200 MHz |
| Shader Units | 256 | 128 |
| TMUs | 16 | 8 |
| ROPs | 8 | 4 |
| Execution Units | 4 | 2 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 4 | 2 |
| L1 cache | n/a | 128 KB/core |
| L2 cache | n/a | 2000 KB/core |
| Instructions per Clock | 4 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 23 Gpix/sec | 8-9 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 46 GTex/s | 15-18 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 3 TFLOPS | 0.5-0.6 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| TGP | 15-54 W | 15 W |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Max temperature | 100 °C | n/a |
| Transistor Size | n/a | 122 mm² |
| Transistor count | n/a | 3.4 billion |
| Transistor density | n/a | 27.87 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
| ECC support | n/a | No |
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| DisplayPort | 2.1 | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider AMD Radeon 840M the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
