AMD Radeon 860M vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon 860M, vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon 860M and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
83
49
39
22
The Witcher 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
74
59
41
21
Counter-Strike 2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
125
89
63
27
Far Cry 6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
69
60
42
21
Hogwarts Legacy
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
43
34
24
12
COD Modern Warfare 3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
49
41
30
21
Ghost of Tsushima
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
38
28
21
12
Cyberpunk 2077
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
40
38
20
10
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
73
66
46
21
Avg FPS
1080p Highn/a66
1080p Ultran/a52
1440p Ultran/a36
4K Ultran/a19
Deviationn/aLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon 860M
2572
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
5320
Time Spyn/a5597
Solar Bayn/a17950
Port Royaln/a1507
Fire Striken/a14832
Night Raidn/a60559
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon 860M
25630
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
67761
Background Blur57.2 frames/s119.1 frames/s
Face Detection30.5 frames/s64.8 frames/s
Horizon Detection0.83 Gpix/sec2.58 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection1.16 Gpix/sec3.28 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur0.93 Gpix/sec3.37 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.35 Gpix/sec0.88 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching97.8 Gpix/sec300.1 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics3933.5 fps8599.6 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon 860M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
10161
G2D Markn/a477
DirectX 11n/a87 fps
DirectX 12n/a39 fps
GPU Computen/a3717 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon 860M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
54.4 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)n/a310 fps
Car Chasen/a289.4 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)n/a257.9 fps
T-Rexn/a1225.1 fps
ALU 2n/a1359 fps
Driver Overhead 2n/a199 fps
APIn/aOpenGL
OSn/aWindows
Tessellationn/a1509.1

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Announced January, 7, 2025 April, 23, 2019
Form Factor Laptop use Laptop use
Use case Universal Gaming
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 3.5 Turing
Codename Krackan Point TU116 (N18E-G0)

GPU

GPU Frequency n/a 1455 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 3000 MHz 1590 MHz
Shader Units 512 1536
TMUs 32 96
ROPs 16 48
Execution Units 8 24
Ray Tracing Cores 8 No
Tensor Cores n/a No
L1 cache n/a 64 KB/core
L2 cache n/a 1536 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 4 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 48 Gpix/sec 76 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 96 GTex/s 153 GTex/s
FLOPS 6.1 TFLOPS 4.9 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP 15-54 W 80 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 4 nm 12 nm
Max temperature 100 °C n/a
Transistor Size n/a 284 mm²
Transistor count n/a 6.6 billion
Transistor density n/a 23.24 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface System Shared GDDR6
Memory Frequency n/a 1500 MHz
Bus n/a 192 bit
ECC support n/a No
Effective Memory Speed n/a 12000 MB/s
Memory Size n/a 6 GB
Max Throughput
AMD Radeon 860M
n/a
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
288 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA n/a 7.5
DisplayPort 2.1 1.4
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below