AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Games

FPS Table
Game title
1080p (High)
1080p (Ultra)
1440p (Ultra)
4K (Ultra)
Forza Horizon 5
133
73
58
38
54
31
23
14
The Witcher 3
121
96
68
34
41
35
22
11
Counter-Strike 2
185
128
93
49
74
54
35
13
Far Cry 6
104
90
65
35
44
42
28
14
Hogwarts Legacy
68
59
40
23
24
20
14
n/a
COD Modern Warfare 3
93
86
60
38
37
31
18
12
Ghost of Tsushima
74
61
42
23
24
18
13
n/a
Cyberpunk 2077
73
64
37
18
26
22
13
n/a
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
124
107
76
37
47
42
27
14
Avg FPS
1080p High10841
1080p Ultra8533
1440p Ultra6021
4K Ultra3311
DeviationLowLow

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
3DMark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
9026
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
3419
Time Spy96523565
Solar Bay3750312312
Port Royal4603n/a
Fire Strike286689684
Night Raid11484246016
GeekBench v6
GB6 Compute Score
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
84088
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
39481
Background Blur208 frames/s66.4 frames/s
Face Detection114.6 frames/s43.3 frames/s
Horizon Detection2.91 Gpix/sec1.51 Gpix/sec
Edge Detection3.71 Gpix/sec1.68 Gpix/sec
Gaussian Blur3.38 Gpix/sec1.87 Gpix/sec
Feature Matching0.94 Gpix/sec0.49 Gpix/sec
Stereo Matching306 Gpix/sec187.9 Gpix/sec
Particle Physics11198.1 fps5261.5 fps
APIOpenCLOpenCL
PassMark
PassMark Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
16471
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
7880
G2D Mark911565
DirectX 11163 fps58 fps
DirectX 1261 fps35 fps
GPU Compute7706 Ops/s3058 Ops/s
GFXBench 5
Aztec Ruins (High 4K)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
116.8 fps
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
47.5 fps
Aztec Ruins (Normal)690.3 fps251.1 fps
Car Chasen/a240.5 fps
Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p)525.1 fps200.6 fps
T-Rex2173.5 fps931.9 fps
ALU 22886.2 fps1021.5 fps
Driver Overhead 2487.2 fps270.6 fps
APIMetalOpenGL
OSOS XWindows
Tessellationn/a1151.2

Tech Specs

Specs & test comparison

General Info

Manufacturer AMD Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Announced July, 30, 2021 April, 23, 2019
Form Factor PC use PC use
Use case Gaming Gaming
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Turing
Codename Navi 23 TU117
Price 379 149

GPU

GPU Frequency 1968 MHz 1485 MHz
Boost GPU Frequency 2589 MHz 1665 MHz
Shader Units 2048 896
TMUs 128 56
ROPs 64 32
Execution Units n/a 14
Ray Tracing Cores 32 No
Tensor Cores No No
L1 cache 128 KB/core 64 KB/core
L2 cache 2000 KB/core 1024 KB/core
Instructions per Clock 2 IPC 2 IPC

Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 166 Gpix/sec 53 Gpix/sec
Texture Fill Rate 331 GTex/s 93 GTex/s
FLOPS 10.6 TFLOPS 3 TFLOPS

Process

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP 160 W 75 W
Process TSMC TSMC
Process tech. 7 nm 12 nm
Transistor Size 237 mm² 200 mm²
Transistor count 11 billion 4 billion
Transistor density 46.41 MTr/mm² 20 MTr/mm²

Memory

Interface GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory Frequency 2000 MHz 2001 MHz
Bus 128 bit 128 bit
ECC support No No
Effective Memory Speed 16000 MB/s 8000 MB/s
Memory Size 8 GB 4 GB
Max Throughput
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
256 GB/s
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
128.1 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
CUDA n/a 7.5
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4a
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which GPU would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below