AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Apple M5 Pro GPU (16-core)
32
out 100
VS
42
out 100
Compared 2 processors: AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, vs Apple M5 Pro GPU (16-core). Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Games
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan
AI/ML
AI workload testing
Professional Apps
3D modeling, video editing, rendering
Energy Efficiency
Power usage in various scenarios
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonGames
| Game title | 1080p (High) 1080p (Ultra) 1440p (Ultra) 4K (Ultra) | |
 Forza Horizon 5 | 132 74 61 39 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 The Witcher 3 | 123 98 66 37 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Counter-Strike 2 | 196 133 95 49 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Far Cry 6 | 105 94 69 38 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Hogwarts Legacy | 72 57 44 21 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 COD Modern Warfare 3 | 97 87 61 37 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Ghost of Tsushima | 78 63 44 24 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Cyberpunk 2077 | 74 63 40 20 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
 Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 124 112 79 40 | n/a n/a n/a n/a |
| 1080p High | 111 | n/a |
| 1080p Ultra | 87 | n/a |
| 1440p Ultra | 62 | n/a |
| 4K Ultra | 34 | n/a |
| Deviation | Low | n/a |
Benchmarks
| Time Spy | 9919 | n/a |
| Solar Bay | 38698 | 39437 |
| Port Royal | 4882 | n/a |
| Fire Strike | 29382 | n/a |
| Night Raid | 115897 | n/a |
| Background Blur | 220.1 frames/s | 153.3 frames/s |
| Face Detection | 128.3 frames/s | 101 frames/s |
| Horizon Detection | 2.94 Gpix/sec | 2.82 Gpix/sec |
| Edge Detection | 4.13 Gpix/sec | 4.09 Gpix/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 3.68 Gpix/sec | 3.69 Gpix/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.94 Gpix/sec | 0.84 Gpix/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 408.2 Gpix/sec | 212.6 Gpix/sec |
| Particle Physics | 10694.7 fps | 9757.6 fps |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| G2D Mark | 914 | n/a |
| DirectX 11 | 169 fps | n/a |
| DirectX 12 | 61 fps | n/a |
| GPU Compute | 7820 Ops/s | n/a |
| Aztec Ruins (Normal) | 817.2 fps | n/a |
| Car Chase | 718.6 fps | n/a |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 586 fps | n/a |
| T-Rex | 2660.2 fps | n/a |
| ALU 2 | 3188.1 fps | n/a |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 287.1 fps | n/a |
| API | OpenGL | n/a |
| OS | Windows | n/a |
| Tessellation | 2225.3 | n/a |
| Image Classification (SP) | n/a | 8260 |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | n/a | 25244 |
| Horizon Detection | n/a | 33177 |
| Face Detection (HP) | n/a | 51773 |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | n/a | 190718 |
| Text Classification (SP) | n/a | 2913 |
| Machine Translation (HP) | n/a | 8985 |
| Object Detection (SP) | n/a | 7777 |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | n/a | 63837 |
| Style Transfer (SP) | n/a | 128419 |
| Framework | n/a | Core ML |
| Backend | n/a | GPU |
Tech Specs
Specs & test comparisonGeneral Info
| Manufacturer | AMD | Apple |
| Build | Discrete | Integrated |
| Announced | May, 10, 2022 | March, 3, 2026 |
| Form Factor | PC use | Laptop use |
| Use case | Gaming | Professional |
| Segment | High-end | Mid-range |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Apple M GPU |
| Codename | Navi 23 | Custom |
| Price | 399 | n/a |
GPU
| GPU Frequency | 2055 MHz | n/a |
| Boost GPU Frequency | 2635 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Shader Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| Execution Units | n/a | 256 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | n/a |
| Tensor Cores | No | n/a |
| L1 cache | 128 KB/core | n/a |
| L2 cache | 2000 KB/core | n/a |
| Instructions per Clock | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 169 Gpix/sec | 104 Gpix/sec |
| Texture Fill Rate | 337 GTex/s | 207 GTex/s |
| FLOPS | 10.8 TFLOPS | 6.6 TFLOPS |
Process
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | Custom |
| TGP | 176 W | n/a |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process tech. | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Max temperature | n/a | 100 °C |
| Transistor Size | 237 mm² | n/a |
| Transistor count | 11 billion | 28 billion |
| Transistor density | 46.41 MTr/mm² | n/a |
Memory
| Interface | GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Memory Frequency | 2190 MHz | 9600 MHz |
| Bus | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| ECC support | No | No |
| Effective Memory Speed | 17500 MB/s | n/a |
| Memory Size | 8 GB | n/a |
Max Throughput
API
| DirectX | 12 | n/a |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | n/a |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | n/a |
| DisplayPort | 1.4a | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Apple M5 Pro GPU (16-core) the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 5
