Home Phone comparison Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and Xiaomi 17 Ultra - Which is better?

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

79 out 100
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
VS
95 out 100
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Compared 2 smartphones : Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold Manufactured in October, 2025, with display 8 with chipsetGoogle Tensor G5, vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra, Manufactured in December, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
  • Larger display: 8in
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.4
Reasons to choose Xiaomi 17 Ultra
  • Higher pixel density: 416ppi
  • Lighter design: 224g vs 258g
  • Higher battery capacity: 6800mAh vs 5015mAh
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
  • Infrared port
  • Includes charger

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB		 - 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Pixel 10 Pro Fold
vs
Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Display

Display quality comparison
Type OLED AMOLED
Size 8 in 6.9 in
Resolution 2076x2152 pixels 1200x2608 pixels
Aspect ratio 1:1 19.5:9
Pixel density 374 ppi 416 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max brightness 3000 nits 1200 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, Dolby Vision
Screen-to-body ratio 88.5 % 92.4 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 155.2 mm (6.11 in) 162.9 mm (6.41 in)
Width 150.4 mm (5.92 in) 77.6 mm (3.06 in)
Thickness 5.2 mm (0.2 in) 8.29 mm (0.33 in)
Weight 258 g (9.1 oz) 224 g (7.9 oz)
Water resistance IP68 IP69
Cooling system Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Back panel Glass Eco Leather
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Gray
- Green		 - White
- Black
- Green
- Purple
Fingerprint sensor Yes, In-Button Yes, In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
88.5 %
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
92.4 %

Performance

Testing Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and Xiaomi 17 Ultra In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Google Tensor G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max Frequency 3780 MHz 4610 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 5 + 2) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 2/2.25 (Cortex-A520)
- 5/3.05 (Cortex-A725)
- 1/3.78 (Cortex-X4)		 6/3.63 ()
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 3 nm
Neural Processor Yes Hexagon
Graphics PowerVR DXT-48-1536 Adreno 840
GPU Cores n/a 1536
GPU Frequency 1100 MHz 1200 MHz
FLOPS 1536 GFLOPS 3686.4 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
2410
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
3510
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
6985
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
10993
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)24103510
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)698510993
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
1523930
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
3963774
CPU3911961198653
GPU5205311458267
Memory344714501472
UX267489805382
NanoReview Score15239303963774

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 16 GB 12 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency n/a 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB512 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 4.1
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 16 Android 16
UI Skin Stock Android HyperOS 3

Battery

Volume 5015 mAh 6800 mAh
Max Charging Power 30 W 90 W
Battery Type Li-Po Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (15 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse Charging Yes Yes, (Wireless)
Fast Charging Yes (50% in 30 min) Yes

Main camera

Matrix 48 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 8000x6000 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Optical, 5x Optical, 4.3x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 120 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 120 fps)
Slow Motion 240 fps (1080p) 1920 fps (720p)
Wide-angle lens 127 ° 115 °
Lenses count Standard: 48 MP
Telephoto: 10.8 MP
Ultra-wide: 10.5 MP		 Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 200 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Main lens
Matrix48 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.7f/1.7
Focal length25 mm23 mm
SensorSamsung GN8n/a
Sensor size1/21/1 (1)
Pixel size0.8 μm1.6 μm
AutofocusLaser autofocusLaser autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix108 MP200 MP
Aperturef/3.0f/2.4 - 3.0
Focal length112 mm100 mm
SensorSamsung S5K3J1n/a
Sensor size1/21/1.4 (0.71)
Pixel size1.22 μm0.56 μm
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix105 MP50 MP
Aperturef/2.2f/2.2
Focal lengthn/a14 mm
SensorSamsung S5K3J1OmniVision OV50M40
Sensor size1/21/2.88 (0.35)
Pixel size1.22 μm0.61 μm
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 10 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution n/a 8192x6144 pixels
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 23 mm n/a
Sensor Samsung S5K3K1 CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.94 1/2.88 (0.35)
Pixel size 1 μm 0.61 μm
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port No Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*12
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM Moden/aDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *YesYes
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM/EDGE Quad-band (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)GSM B2 / B3 / B5 / B8
3G BandsUMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA 1, 2, 4, 5, 8WCDMA B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B18/B19/B20/B21/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66/B71/B75)LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B66/B71)
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos n/a Yes

Other

Class Flagship Flagship
Announced August, 2025 yr December, 2025 yr
Release Date October, 2025 yr December, 2025 yr
MSRP ($) 1799 n/a
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Barometer
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included No Yes, 100 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi 17 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below