Home Phone comparison Google Pixel 3a and Vivo X200 Ultra - Which is better?

Google Pixel 3a vs Vivo X200 Ultra

41 out 100
Google Pixel 3a
VS
94 out 100
Vivo X200 Ultra
Google Pixel 3a
Vivo X200 Ultra

Compared 2 smartphones : Google Pixel 3a Manufactured in May, 2019, with display 5.6 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 670, vs Vivo X200 Ultra, Manufactured in April, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 3a
  • Lighter design: 147g vs 229g
  • Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Ultra
  • Larger display: 6.82in
  • Higher pixel density: 510ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 3000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
  • Infrared port

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options 4/64 GB - 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Google Pixel 3a and Vivo X200 Ultra
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Google Pixel 3a
vs
Vivo X200 Ultra

Display

Display quality comparison
Type OLED AMOLED
Size 5.6 in 6.82 in
Resolution 1080x2220 pixels 1440x3168 pixels
Aspect ratio 18.5:9 20:9
Pixel density 441 ppi 510 ppi
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes (1-120 Hz)
HDR support No Yes Dolby Vision
Screen-to-body ratio 75 % 89.7 %
Features Always-On Display - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 151.3 mm (5.96 in) 163.14 mm (6.42 in)
Width 70.1 mm (2.76 in) 76.76 mm (3.02 in)
Thickness 8.2 mm (0.32 in) 8.69 mm (0.34 in)
Weight 147 g (5.19 oz) 229 g (8.08 oz)
Water resistance No IP69
Cooling system n/a Vapor chamber
Back panel Plastic Glass
Frame Plastic Metal
Colors - White
- Black
- Purple		 - Black
- Silver
- Red
Fingerprint sensor Yes rear Yes In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Google Pixel 3a
75 %
Vivo X200 Ultra
89.7 %

Performance

Testing Google Pixel 3a and Vivo X200 Ultra In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max Frequency 2000 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6/1.7 (Kryo 360 Silver (Cortex-A55))
- 2/2 (Kryo 360 Gold (Cortex-A75))		 - 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M))
- 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L))
Process Samsung TSMC
Transistor Size 10 nm 3 nm
Neural Processor Hexagon 685 Hexagon
Graphics Adreno 615 Adreno 830
GPU Cores 256 1536
GPU Frequency 700 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS 358.4 GFLOPS 3379.2 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Google Pixel 3a
519
Vivo X200 Ultra
2979
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Google Pixel 3a
1564
Vivo X200 Ultra
9353
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)5192979
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)15649353
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo X200 Ultra]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Google Pixel 3a
250172
Vivo X200 Ultra
2718159
CPU83481601093
GPU377681227523
Memory61127415530
UX67796474013
NanoReview Score2501722718159
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Google Pixel 3a
665
Vivo X200 Ultra
n/a
Stability99 %n/a
Graphics Test3 fpsn/a
Graphics Score665n/a
Sources: 3DMark [Google Pixel 3a]
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Google Pixel 3a
7363
Vivo X200 Ultra
n/a
Writing score8149n/a
Web score6044n/a
Video editing5761n/a
Data manipulation5686n/a
NanoReview Score7363n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 4 GB - 12 GB
- 16 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 1866 MHz 5333 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage Capacity64 GB- 256 GB
- 512 GB
- 1024 GB
Storage TypeeMMC 5.1UFS 4.1
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 12) Android 15
UI Skin n/a OriginOS 5

Battery

Volume 3000 mAh 6000 mAh
Max Charging Power 18 W 90 W
Battery Type Li-ion Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No Yes (40 W)
Reverse Charging No Yes
Fast Charging Yes Quick Charge 4.0 (50% in 30 min) Yes
Full Charge Time 1:20 h n/a

Main camera

Matrix 122 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 4032x3024 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Digital Optical, 3.7x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 120 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 120 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 240 fps (720p) 960 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens n/a 116 °
Lenses count Standard: 12.2 MP Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 200 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Main lens
Matrix122 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Focal length28 mm35 mm
SensorSony IMX363Sony LYT-818
Sensor size1/2.551/1.28
Pixel size1.4 μm1.22 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusLaser autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrixn/a200 MP
Aperturen/af/2.2
Focal lengthn/a85 mm
Sensorn/aSamsung ISOCELL HP9
Sensor sizen/a1/1.4
Pixel sizen/a0.56 μm
Stabilizationn/aOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrixn/a50 MP
Aperturen/af/2.0
Focal lengthn/a14 mm
Sensorn/aSony LYT-818
Sensor sizen/a1/1.28
Pixel sizen/a122 μm
Stabilizationn/aDigital
Main camera DxOMark results
Sources: DxOMark [Google Pixel 3a]

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 3264x2448 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.5
Focal length 24 mm 24 mm
Sensor Sony IMX355 n/a
Sensor size 1/2.8 n/a
Pixel size 1.12 μm n/a
Autofocus No n/a
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 5.4
Bluetooth features LE, A2DP LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort n/a Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port No Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*12
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *YesNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz
3G BandsHSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8/B6/B19
LTE Bands*LTE (B(22/B)/B3/B700/B800/B850/B900/B1700/B1800/B1900/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600)LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66)
LTE category11n/a
5G SupportNoYes

Sound

Speakers Stereo n/a
3.5 mm Jack Yes No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes

Other

Class Mid-range Flagship
Announced May, 2019 yr April, 2025 yr
Release Date May, 2019 yr April, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 400 900
Sensors - Barometer
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 18 W Yes 80 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below