Google Pixel 7 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra
72
out 100
VS
94
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Google Pixel 7 Pro Manufactured in October, 2022, with display 6.7 with chipsetGoogle Tensor G2, vs Vivo X200 Ultra, Manufactured in April, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 512ppi
- Lighter design: 212g vs 229g
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.82in
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/128 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.82 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3120 pixels | 1440x3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 512 ppi | 510 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (10-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 550 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.3 % | 89.7 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 97 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 4 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.9 mm (6.41 in) | 163.14 mm (6.42 in) |
| Width | 76.6 mm (3.02 in) | 76.76 mm (3.02 in) |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) | 8.69 mm (0.34 in) |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 229 g (8.08 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray |
- Black - Silver - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Google Tensor G2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Max Frequency | 2850 MHz | 4320 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.35 (Cortex-A78) - 2/2.85 (Cortex-X1) |
- 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M)) - 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L)) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G710 MP7 | Adreno 830 |
| GPU Cores | 672 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1142.4 GFLOPS | 3379.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1404 | 2979 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3368 | 9353 |
| CPU | 241450 | 601093 |
| GPU | 297846 | 1227523 |
| Memory | 185192 | 415530 |
| UX | 214960 | 474013 |
| NanoReview Score | 939448 | 2718159 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 44.9 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 71 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 38 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 6383 | n/a |
| Writing score | 16136 | n/a |
| Web score | 9151 | n/a |
| Video editing | 6755 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 10868 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 11564 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB - 512 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 14 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | Stock Android | OriginOS 5 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 23 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (23 W) | Yes (40 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (46% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:49 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 07:06 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 12:49 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:48 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 83 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 5x | Optical, 3.7x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 126 ° | 116 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 35 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung GN1 | Sony LYT-818 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.31 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 1.2 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/3.5 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 120 mm | 85 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGM1 | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55 | 1/1.4 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.56 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX381 | Sony LYT-818 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.9 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 1.25 μm | 122 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 70 | n/a |
| Preview | 74 | n/a |
| Zoom | 143 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3648x2736 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA Bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8/B6/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B46/B48/B66/B71) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66) |
| LTE category | 20 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October, 2022 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2022 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 899 | 900 |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
