Google Pixel 7a vs Vivo X90 Pro Plus
68
out 100
VS
78
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Google Pixel 7a Manufactured in May, 2023, with display 6.1 with chipsetGoogle Tensor G2, vs Vivo X90 Pro Plus, Manufactured in December, 2022with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 7a
- Lighter design: 193.5g vs 221g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Vivo X90 Pro Plus
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 517ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 4700mAh vs 4385mAh
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | 8/128 GB | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.1 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1440x3200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 517 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 700 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.1 % | 89.7 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 98.4 % | 100 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 218 Hz | 222 Hz |
| Response time | 2 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 152 mm (5.98 in) | 164.4 mm (6.47 in) |
| Width | 72.9 mm (2.87 in) | 75.3 mm (2.96 in) |
| Thickness | 9 mm (0.35 in) | 9.7 mm (0.38 in) |
| Weight | 193.5 g (6.83 oz) | 221 g (7.8 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP67 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Gray - Blue - Orange |
- Black - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Google Tensor G2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Max Frequency | 2850 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) | 8 (1 + 2 + 2 + 3) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.35 (Cortex-A78) - 2/2.85 (Cortex-X1) |
- 3/2 (Cortex-A510) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A710) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.2 (Cortex-X3) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G710 MP7 | Adreno 740 |
| GPU Cores | 672 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 680 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1142.4 GFLOPS | 2089 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1443 | 1773 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3493 | 5153 |
| CPU | 255576 | 385400 |
| GPU | 325623 | 600606 |
| Memory | 149843 | 329145 |
| UX | 199394 | 287653 |
| NanoReview Score | 930436 | 1602804 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 50.8 °C | 35 °C |
| Stability | 65 % | 83 % |
| Graphics Test | 37 fps | 79 fps |
| Graphics Score | 6343 | 13231 |
| Writing score | 15048 | 18885 |
| Web score | 7500 | 8920 |
| Video editing | 6362 | 5984 |
| Data manipulation | 10504 | 9430 |
| NanoReview Score | 10609 | 12539 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 13 |
| OS Size | n/a | 37 GB |
| UI Skin | Stock Android | OriginOS |
Battery
| Volume | 4385 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (7.5 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (20% in 36 min) | Yes (50% in 12 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:57 h | 0:34 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:24 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 13:40 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:06 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 76 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 503 MP |
| Photo resolution | 9000x7000 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3.5x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Up to 24FPS |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 114 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP |
Standard: 50.3 MP Telephoto: 64 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 48 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 503 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX787 | Sony IMX989 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.73 | 1/1.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 1.6 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 64 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/3.5 |
| Focal length | n/a | 90 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Omnivision OV64B |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.0 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.7 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX712 | Sony IMX598 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 | 1/2.0 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 70 | 70 |
| Preview | 69 | 71 |
| Zoom | 105 | 150 |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4032x3024 pixels | 6528x4896 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | n/a | 24 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KGD1 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | n/a | No |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM/EDGE: Quad-band (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz) | n/a |
| 3G Bands | UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA: Bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B38/B40/B41/B48/B66/B71) | n/a |
| LTE category | 20 | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | n/a |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | May, 2023 yr | November, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2023 yr | December, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 499 | 900 |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X90 Pro Plus the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
