Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus
77
out 100
VS
54
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Manufactured in September, 2024, with display 8 with chipsetGoogle Tensor G4, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus, Manufactured in November, 2021 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 920. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- Larger display: 8in
- Higher battery capacity: 4650mAh vs 4500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus
- Higher pixel density: 395ppi
- Lighter design: 204g vs 257g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 8 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 2076x2152 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 373 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 2700 nits | 700 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6 % | 86.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 98.5 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 120 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 4 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 155.2 mm (6.11 in) | 163.65 mm (6.44 in) |
| Width | 150.2 mm (5.91 in) | 76.19 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 5.1 mm (0.2 in) | 8.34 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 257 g (9.07 oz) | 204 g (7.2 oz) |
| Water resistance | IPX8 | IP53 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black |
- Black - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Google Tensor G4 | MediaTek Dimensity 920 |
| Max Frequency | 3100 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.92 (Cortex-A520) - 3/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.1 (Cortex-X4) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G715 MP7 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
| GPU Cores | 896 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 940 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1792 GFLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2048 | 928 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4910 | 2325 |
| CPU | 311982 | 174554 |
| GPU | 442023 | 109191 |
| Memory | 200125 | 108745 |
| UX | 228980 | 157328 |
| NanoReview Score | 1183110 | 549818 |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 12 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 2125 |
| Writing score | n/a | 12160 |
| Web score | n/a | 8057 |
| Video editing | n/a | 6762 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 9426 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 10669 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 16 GB | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| OS Size | 27 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | Stock Android | MIUI 14 |
Battery
| Volume | 4650 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 120 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (7.5 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (46% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 7 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:36 h | 0:16 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:24 h | 06:07 h |
| Video Playback | 12:56 h | 10:32 h |
| Games | 05:05 h | 04:37 h |
| Standby Mode | 85 h | 84 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8000x6000 pixels | 12032x9024 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 5x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 127 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 48 MP Telephoto: 10.8 MP Ultra-wide: 10.5 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KHM2 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0 | 1/1.52 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 108 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/3.1 | n/a |
| Focal length | 112 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.2 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 105 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 16 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5K4H7 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.4 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 55 | n/a |
| Preview | 77 | n/a |
| Zoom | 124 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 10 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony IMX 471 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.94 | 1/3 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM/EDGE Quad-band (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz) | GSM 850 900 1800 1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B18/B19/B20/B21/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B46/B48/B66/B71) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66) |
| LTE category | n/a | 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | August, 2024 yr | October, 2021 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2024 yr | November, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 1799 | 350 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes 120 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
