Honor X7d vs Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
58
out 100
VS
90
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor X7d Manufactured in August, 2025, with display 6.77 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685, vs Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo, Manufactured in January, 2026 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor X7d
- Larger display: 6.77in
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
- Higher pixel density: 466ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 202g vs 208g
- Higher battery capacity: 7600mAh vs 6500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/128 GB - 16/128 GB - 16/256 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.77 in | 6.59 in |
| Resolution | 1610x720 pixels | 1260x2750 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 261 ppi | 466 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4 % | 90.9 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 166.8 mm (6.57 in) | 157.6 mm (6.2 in) |
| Width | 76.8 mm (3.02 in) | 74.4 mm (2.93 in) |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP65 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Silver - Gold - Green |
- White - Black - Blue - Pink |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 3800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
6/3.32 () |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Adreno 829 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 1024 |
| GPU Frequency | 1260 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| FLOPS | 322.6 GFLOPS | 2457.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 465 | 2753 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1468 | 9572 |
| CPU | 108352 | 1057948 |
| GPU | 38159 | 1157399 |
| Memory | 114138 | 572070 |
| UX | 72107 | 811621 |
| NanoReview Score | 332756 | 3599038 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | n/a | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 9.0 | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 6500 mAh | 7600 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 35 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 42 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:20 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 200 MP |
| Photo resolution | 12000x9000 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | n/a | 23 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.56 (0.64) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 (0.25) |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | n/a | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | August, 2025 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2025 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 350 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 35 W | Yes, 100 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
