Huawei P40 Lite vs Vivo X300
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei P40 Lite Manufactured in March, 2020, with display 6.4 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 810, vs Vivo X300, Manufactured in October, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei P40 Lite
- Larger display: 6.4in
- Lighter design: 183g vs 190g
Reasons to choose Vivo X300
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6040mAh vs 4200mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | LTPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.4 in | 6.31 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2310 pixels | 1216x2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.2:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 398 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | 2000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.6 % | 90.3 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 98.8 % | n/a |
| Response time | 38.4 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 976:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 159.2 mm (6.27 in) | 150.57 mm (5.93 in) |
| Width | 76.3 mm (3 in) | 71.92 mm (2.83 in) |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm (0.34 in) | 7.95 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 190 g (6.7 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Green |
- Black - Blue - Red - Pink - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 810 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 2270 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.9 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | n/a | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP6 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 144 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 820 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | 236.2 GFLOPS | 5271.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 753 | 3383 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1923 | 10099 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 25462 |
| CPU | 140335 | 957632 |
| GPU | 91897 | 1342611 |
| Memory | 93192 | 448412 |
| UX | 103991 | 618759 |
| NanoReview Score | 429415 | 3367414 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 38.6 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 8 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 1421 | n/a |
| Writing score | 9369 | n/a |
| Web score | 5888 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5736 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 7519 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 8141 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | Nano Memory | No |
Software
| OS | Android 10.0 | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 14.6 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | EMUI 12 | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 4200 mAh | 6040 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 40 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (40 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (70% in 30 min) | Yes (73% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:10 h | 0:46 h |
| Web Browsing | 09:55 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 14:27 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:21 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 114 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 MP | 200 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8000x6000 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 480 fps (720p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.68 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX586 Exmor RS | Samsung ISOCELL HPB |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0 | 1/1.4 |
| Pixel size | 1.6 μm | 0.56 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | n/a | 70 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony LYT-602 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.95 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 15 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4920x3264 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | BSI CMOS | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Active | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 1900 / 2300 / 2500 / 2600 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B850/B900/B1800/B1900/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66) |
| LTE category | 12 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | February, 2020 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2020 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 265 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 699 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X300 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0