Huawei P40 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
61
out 100
VS
90
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei P40 Pro Manufactured in March, 2020, with display 6.58 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, vs Vivo X300 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei P40 Pro
- Lighter design: 209g vs 226g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Vivo X300 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 452ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6510mAh vs 4200mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.1
- Supports DisplayPort
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.58 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1200x2640 pixels | 1260x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 441 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 600 nits | 2000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.5 % | 90.8 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.4 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 365 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 3 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 158.2 mm (6.23 in) | 161.98 mm (6.38 in) |
| Width | 72.6 mm (2.86 in) | 75.48 mm (2.97 in) |
| Thickness | 9 mm (0.35 in) | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 226 g (7.97 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Silver |
- White - Black - Blue - Brown |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 2860 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.36 (Cortex-A76) - 2/2.86 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Da Vinci | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Mali-G76 MP16 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 576 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | 691.2 GFLOPS | 5271.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1111 | 3447 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3131 | 10378 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 25723 |
| CPU | 217681 | 1043247 |
| GPU | 212255 | 1510982 |
| Memory | 146459 | 667254 |
| UX | 141962 | 790449 |
| NanoReview Score | 718357 | 4011932 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 34.2 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 55 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 19 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 3286 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | Nano Memory | No |
Software
| OS | Android 10.0 | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 16.5 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | EMUI 11 | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 4200 mAh | 6510 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 40 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (27 W) | Yes (40 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (70% in 40 min) | Yes (55% in 15 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:15 h | 0:29 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:10 h | 08:45 h |
| Video Playback | 13:26 h | 14:55 h |
| Games | 04:54 h | 06:08 h |
| Standby Mode | 81 h | 81 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 5x | Optical, 3.7x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 7680 fps (720p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 12 MP Ultra-wide: 40 MP Depth |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX700 | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/3.4 | f/2.7 |
| Focal length | 125 mm | 85 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HPB |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.4 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.56 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 40 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 18 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX650 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.54 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 75 | n/a |
| Preview | 45 | n/a |
| Zoom | 124 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6464x4864 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | BSI CMOS | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B6/B7/B8/B9/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66) |
| LTE category | 21 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | March, 2020 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2020 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 720 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 899 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Face Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X300 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
