Huawei P40 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
61
out 100
VS
85
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei P40 Pro Manufactured in March, 2020, with display 6.58 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro, Manufactured in April, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei P40 Pro
- Lighter design: 209g vs 219g
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
- Larger display: 6.83in
- Higher pixel density: 447ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7550mAh vs 4200mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.58 in | 6.83 in |
| Resolution | 1200x2640 pixels | 1280x2772 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 441 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 600 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 480 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.5 % | 90.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.4 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 365 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 3 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 158.2 mm (6.23 in) | 163.1 mm (6.42 in) |
| Width | 72.6 mm (2.86 in) | 77.93 mm (3.07 in) |
| Thickness | 9 mm (0.35 in) | 7.98 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 219 g (7.72 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Silver |
- White - Black - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 2860 MHz | 3210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.36 (Cortex-A76) - 2/2.86 (Cortex-A76) |
- 2/2.02 (Cortex-A720) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.21 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Da Vinci | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 825 |
| GPU Cores | 576 | 1024 |
| GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| FLOPS | 691.2 GFLOPS | 2355.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1111 | 2154 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3131 | 6880 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 18525 |
| CPU | 217681 | 466100 |
| GPU | 212255 | 938050 |
| Memory | 146459 | 431133 |
| UX | 141962 | 325261 |
| NanoReview Score | 718357 | 2160544 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 34.2 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 55 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 19 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 3286 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | Nano Memory | No |
Software
| OS | Android 10.0 | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 16.5 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | EMUI 11 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 4200 mAh | 7550 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 40 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (27 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (70% in 40 min) | Yes (50% in 27 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:15 h | 1:00 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:10 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 13:26 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:54 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 81 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Optical, 5x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 7680 fps (720p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 12 MP Ultra-wide: 40 MP Depth |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX700 | Sony LYT-600 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28 | 1/1.95 |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 12 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/3.4 | n/a |
| Focal length | 125 mm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 40 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 18 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX650 | Sony IMX355 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.54 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.14 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 75 | n/a |
| Preview | 45 | n/a |
| Zoom | 124 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6464x4864 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | BSI CMOS | Omnivision OV20B |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | GSM B3/B5/B8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | WCDMA B1/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B6/B7/B8/B9/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32) | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B19/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) |
| LTE category | 21 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | n/a |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | March, 2020 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2020 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 720 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Face Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
