Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4G vs Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4G Manufactured in November, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G100, vs Oppo K13 Turbo Pro, Manufactured in July, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
- Lighter design: 190g vs 208g
Reasons to choose Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Higher pixel density: 453ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5000mAh
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.8 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 pixels | 1280x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1800 nits | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87 % | 90.3 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 166.98 mm (6.57 in) | 162.8 mm (6.41 in) |
| Width | 76.4 mm (3.01 in) | 77.2 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm (0.29 in) | 8.3 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP54 | IPX9 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Active fan |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gray - Blue |
- Black - Silver - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 3210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 2/2.02 (Cortex-A720) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.21 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Adreno 825 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 1024 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | 2355.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 731 | 2135 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2024 | 6613 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 1413 | 18374 |
| CPU | 138057 | 488465 |
| GPU | 70827 | 879994 |
| Memory | 114971 | 358672 |
| UX | 107432 | 323198 |
| NanoReview Score | 431287 | 2050329 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | XOS 14.5 | ColorOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (75% in 35 min) | Yes (63% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:35 h | 0:56 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4208x3120 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Quad LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 120 fps (1080p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP Depth |
Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Hi-5022Q | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4920x3264 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | n/a | 22 mm |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC08A8 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2/3/5/8 | GSM 900/1800MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 | WCDMA 1/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1234578202828B384140) | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B18/B19/B26/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2024 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 359 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | Yes, 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo K13 Turbo Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0