Motorola Moto G55 vs Huawei P40 Lite
Compared 2 smartphones : Motorola Moto G55 Manufactured in September, 2024, with display 6.49 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7025, vs Huawei P40 Lite, Manufactured in March, 2020 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 810. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Motorola Moto G55
- Larger display: 6.49in
- Higher pixel density: 405ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 182g vs 183g
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4200mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Huawei P40 Lite
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | LTPS LCD |
| Size | 6.49 in | 6.4 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1080x2310 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.2:9 |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 560 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.2 % | 83.6 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 99.8 % | 98.8 % |
| Response time | 28 ms | 38.4 ms |
| Contrast | 2420:1 | 976:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 161.56 mm (6.36 in) | 159.2 mm (6.27 in) |
| Width | 73.82 mm (2.91 in) | 76.3 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 8.09 mm (0.32 in) | 8.7 mm (0.34 in) |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| Water resistance | Yes | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gray - Green - Purple |
- Black - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | HiSilicon Kirin 810 |
| Max Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2270 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
- 6/1.9 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | n/a |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G52 MP6 |
| GPU Cores | 144 | 144 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 820 MHz |
| FLOPS | 274 GFLOPS | 236.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1021 | 753 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2430 | 1923 |
| CPU | 158235 | 140335 |
| GPU | 29954 | 91897 |
| Memory | 113626 | 93192 |
| UX | 140556 | 103991 |
| NanoReview Score | 442371 | 429415 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 38.6 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 8 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 1421 |
| Writing score | n/a | 9369 |
| Web score | n/a | 5888 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5736 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 7519 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 8141 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | Nano Memory |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10.0 |
| OS Size | n/a | 14.6 GB |
| UI Skin | Hello UI | EMUI 12 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 30 W | 40 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (54% in 30 min) | Yes (70% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:14 h | 1:10 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 09:55 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 14:27 h |
| Games | n/a | 05:21 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 114 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 118 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony IMX586 Exmor RS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.61 μm | 1.6 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4920x3264 pixels | 4920x3264 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | n/a | BSI CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Active |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 1900 / 2300 / 2500 / 2600 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/5/8 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B850/B900/B1800/B1900/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) |
| LTE category | 18 | 12 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | August, 2024 yr | February, 2020 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2024 yr | March, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 249 | 265 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 30 W | n/a |
Note
Motorola Moto G55:
The eco-leather version is thicker at 8.19 and weighs 3 grams more than the plastic one.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Motorola Moto G55 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0