OnePlus 10 Pro vs Oppo Find X9s Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : OnePlus 10 Pro Manufactured in January, 2022, with display 6.7 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, vs Oppo Find X9s Pro, Manufactured in May, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose OnePlus 10 Pro
- Larger display: 6.7in
- Higher pixel density: 525ppi
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9s Pro
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 198g vs 200.5g
- Higher battery capacity: 7025mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.1 vs 5.2
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.32 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3216 pixels | 1216x2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 525 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 1000 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9 % | 90.9 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 98.3 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 342 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 11 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 163 mm (6.42 in) | 150.5 mm (5.93 in) |
| Width | 73.9 mm (2.91 in) | 71.7 mm (2.82 in) |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm (0.34 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 200.5 g (7.07 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Water resistance | n/a | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Green |
- White - Gray - Blue - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 3000 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A510) - 3/2.5 (Cortex-A710) - 1/3 (Cortex-X2) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Adreno 730 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 1024 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 818 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 1675.3 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1300 | 3302 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3445 | 10598 |
| CPU | 309169 | 975847 |
| GPU | 456180 | 1334740 |
| Memory | 179061 | 388222 |
| UX | 169746 | 641387 |
| NanoReview Score | 1114156 | 3340196 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 46.5 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 64 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 57 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 9541 | n/a |
| Writing score | 17026 | n/a |
| Web score | 9547 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5903 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 9091 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 11771 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB - 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 12.1 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 32 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | OxygenOS 14 | ColorOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 7025 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (98% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 0:32 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 07:41 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 12:41 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:53 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 108 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 MP | 200 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8000x6000 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.3x | Optical, 2.8x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Up to 24FPS | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 240 fps) | Yes (Up to 240 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 480 fps (720p) | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 150 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 48 MP Telephoto: 8 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX789 | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.43 | 1/1.4 (0.71) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 77 mm | 65 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08A10 | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.4 | 1/1.56 (0.64) |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 65 | n/a |
| Preview | 68 | n/a |
| Zoom | 105 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | n/a | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX615 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 6.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | n/a |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2, 3, 5, 8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 19 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B30/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B46/B48/B66/B71) | n/a |
| LTE category | 20 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | n/a |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | January, 2022 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2022 yr | May, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 899 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 780 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | Yes, 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9s Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0