OnePlus 13 vs Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Compared 2 smartphones : OnePlus 13 Manufactured in January, 2025, with display 6.82 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, vs Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite, Manufactured in September, 2019 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 710. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose OnePlus 13
- Larger display: 6.82in
- Higher pixel density: 510ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 4030mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
- Lighter design: 179g vs 213g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 24/1024 GB |
- 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.82 in | 6.39 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 pixels | 1080x2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 510 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1600 nits | 430 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1 % | 85.8 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.6 % | 95.8 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 120 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time | 2 ms | 3.4 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.9 mm (6.41 in) | 156.8 mm (6.17 in) |
| Width | 76.5 mm (3.01 in) | 74.5 mm (2.93 in) |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) | 8.7 mm (0.34 in) |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue |
- White - Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 |
| Max Frequency | 4320 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M)) - 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L)) |
- 6/1.7 (Kryo 360 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.2 (Kryo 360 Gold (Cortex-A75)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 10 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Hexagon 685 |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Adreno 616 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 500 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3379.2 GFLOPS | 384 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2946 | 527 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8999 | 1574 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 24179 | n/a |
| CPU | 636212 | 97913 |
| GPU | 1240330 | 56171 |
| Memory | 533673 | 67596 |
| UX | 440043 | 83495 |
| NanoReview Score | 2840258 | 305175 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 47.8 °C | 43.2 °C |
| Stability | 81 % | 96 % |
| Graphics Test | 122 fps | 3 fps |
| Graphics Score | 20587 | 550 |
| Writing score | 21864 | 7643 |
| Web score | 14028 | 5770 |
| Video editing | 6741 | 5646 |
| Data manipulation | 16580 | 5892 |
| NanoReview Score | 16150 | 7148 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB - 24 GB |
6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 5333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 11) |
| OS Size | 54 GB | 13 GB |
| UI Skin | OxygenOS 15 | MIUI 12.5 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 4030 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 100 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (55% in 15 min) | Yes Quick Charge 3.0 (50% in 35 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:35 h | 1:55 h |
| Web Browsing | 13:42 h | 07:34 h |
| Video Playback | 23:46 h | 11:52 h |
| Games | 06:05 h | 04:35 h |
| Standby Mode | 120 h | 138 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 118 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony LYTIA-808 | Sony IMX586 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | n/a |
| Focal length | 73 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.75 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 6528x4896 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX615 | Samsung S5KGD1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, HID, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B30/B32/B66/B71) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4(1700/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B2100)) |
| LTE category | n/a | 12 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | September, 2019 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2025 yr | September, 2019 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 899 | 320 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 100 W | n/a |
Note
OnePlus 13:
The "Arctic Dawn" and "Black Eclipse" models are 8.5 thick and weigh 213g, while "Midnight Ocean" is 8.9 and 210g. The Chinese and Indian versions do not support eSIM.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider OnePlus 13 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1