Oppo Find X8 vs Vivo X90 Pro Plus
89
out 100
VS
78
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Find X8 Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.59 with chipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400, vs Vivo X90 Pro Plus, Manufactured in December, 2022 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X8
- Lighter design: 193g vs 221g
- Higher battery capacity: 5630mAh vs 4700mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Vivo X90 Pro Plus
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 517ppi
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.0
- Supports DisplayPort
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.59 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1256x2760 pixels | 1440x3200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 517 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | 4500 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6 % | 89.7 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 100 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 222 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 1 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 157.35 mm (6.19 in) | 164.4 mm (6.47 in) |
| Width | 74.33 mm (2.93 in) | 75.3 mm (2.96 in) |
| Thickness | 7.85 mm (0.31 in) | 9.7 mm (0.38 in) |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 221 g (7.8 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue - Pink |
- Black - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Max Frequency | 3300 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 2 + 2 + 3) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925) |
- 3/2 (Cortex-A510) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A710) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.2 (Cortex-X3) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 890 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Adreno 740 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 1612 MHz | 680 MHz |
| FLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS | 2089 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2892 | 1773 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8858 | 5153 |
| CPU | 543756 | 385400 |
| GPU | 1028657 | 600606 |
| Memory | 420636 | 329145 |
| UX | 386238 | 287653 |
| NanoReview Score | 2379287 | 1602804 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 35 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 83 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 79 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 13231 |
| Writing score | n/a | 18885 |
| Web score | n/a | 8920 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5984 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 9430 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 12539 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 |
| OS Size | n/a | 37 GB |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 15 | OriginOS |
Battery
| Volume | 5630 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (70% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 12 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:52 h | 0:34 h |
| Web Browsing | 09:03 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 14:03 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:50 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 102 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 503 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3.5x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Up to 24FPS |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 480 fps (720p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 114 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 50.3 MP Telephoto: 64 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 48 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 503 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-700 | Sony IMX989 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/1.0 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.6 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/3.5 |
| Focal length | 73 mm | 90 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | Omnivision OV64B |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | 1/2.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | Sony IMX598 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/2.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | n/a | 70 |
| Preview | n/a | 71 |
| Zoom | n/a | 150 |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 6528x4896 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX615 | Samsung S5KGD1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800MHz | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) | n/a |
| LTE category | n/a | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | November, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | December, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 590 | 900 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | Yes 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X8 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
