Oppo Find X9 vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Find X9 Manufactured in October, 2025, with display 6.59 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500, vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, Manufactured in March, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 7025mAh vs 6150mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.3
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 178g vs 203g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.59 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1256x2760 pixels | 1208x2644 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1800 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4 % | 90.3 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design & Build
| Height | 157 mm (6.18 in) | 162.4 mm (6.39 in) |
| Width | 73.9 mm (2.91 in) | 77 mm (3.03 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 7.4 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray - Red |
- Black - Blue - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Max Frequency | 4210 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 990 | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1716 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | 5271.5 GFLOPS | 665.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 3291 | 1035 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 9664 | 2980 |
| CPU | 1017782 | 255071 |
| GPU | 1439021 | 185764 |
| Memory | 681095 | 173375 |
| UX | 763877 | 184823 |
| NanoReview Score | 3901775 | 799033 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 5333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 16 | HIOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 7025 mAh | 6150 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes, (Wireless) | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (42% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 1:20 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 11:44 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 21:09 h |
| Games | n/a | 06:57 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 100 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8160x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 480 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 112 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.65 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-808 | Sony LYT-700C |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | 1/1.56 (0.64) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 73 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | 1/2.88 (0.35) |
| Pixel size | 0.5 μm | 0.61 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/4.0 (0.25) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8160x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74 | 1/2.76 (0.36) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800MHz | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B66) | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2025 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2025 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 999 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0