Oppo Realme 8 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra
50
out 100
VS
94
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Realme 8 Pro Manufactured in March, 2021, with display 6.4 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 720G, vs Vivo X200 Ultra, Manufactured in April, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme 8 Pro
- Lighter design: 176g vs 229g
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.82in
- Higher pixel density: 510ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 4500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.4 in | 6.82 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1440x3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 510 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 430 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 180 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.3 % | 89.7 % |
| Features | - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.9 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 114 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 7 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 160.6 mm (6.32 in) | 163.14 mm (6.42 in) |
| Width | 73.9 mm (2.91 in) | 76.76 mm (3.02 in) |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm (0.32 in) | 8.69 mm (0.34 in) |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 229 g (8.08 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Yellow |
- Black - Silver - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Max Frequency | 2300 MHz | 4320 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Kryo 465 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.3 (Kryo 465 Gold (Cortex-A76)) |
- 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M)) - 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L)) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 8 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 692 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 618 | Adreno 830 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | 384 GFLOPS | 3379.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 696 | 2979 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1842 | 9353 |
| CPU | 122880 | 601093 |
| GPU | 76972 | 1227523 |
| Memory | 82260 | 415530 |
| UX | 98370 | 474013 |
| NanoReview Score | 380482 | 2718159 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 46.9 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 6 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 1050 | n/a |
| Writing score | 13121 | n/a |
| Web score | 6730 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5913 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 6887 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 9614 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
- 12 GB - 16 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 13 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | Realme UI 4.0 | OriginOS 5 |
Battery
| Volume | 4500 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 50 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (40 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (88% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 0:39 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 09:50 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 13:30 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:43 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 120 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 12032x9204 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3.7x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 116 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP Monochrome: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 35 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KHM2 | Sony LYT-818 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.52 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 200 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 85 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.4 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.56 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony LYT-818 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 122 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4920x3264 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | n/a | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX471 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | UMTS 1/5/8 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8/B6/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66) |
| LTE category | 15 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | March, 2021 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2021 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 350 | 900 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
