Samsung Galaxy A50 vs Oppo Find X9 Pro
40
out 100
VS
96
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy A50 Manufactured in March, 2019, with display 6.4 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610, vs Oppo Find X9 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A50
- Lighter design: 166g vs 224g
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 450ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7500mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.4 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1264x2780 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 650 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9 % | 90 % |
| Features | Always-On Display | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 141.5 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 119 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 7 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 158.5 mm (6.24 in) | 161.26 mm (6.35 in) |
| Width | 74.7 mm (2.94 in) | 76.46 mm (3.01 in) |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm (0.3 in) | 8.25 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 166 g (5.86 oz) | 224 g (7.9 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue |
- White - Gray - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 2300 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.7 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.3 (Cortex-A73) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 54 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | 91.8 GFLOPS | 5271.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 506 | 3235 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1550 | 9626 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 29534 |
| CPU | 83882 | 1030180 |
| GPU | 42251 | 1453877 |
| Memory | 58058 | 709892 |
| UX | 75732 | 762936 |
| NanoReview Score | 259923 | 3956885 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 44.5 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 97 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 4 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 746 | n/a |
| Writing score | 6360 | n/a |
| Web score | 4826 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5198 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5373 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 6024 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 11) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 22 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | One UI 3.1 | ColorOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 4000 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (40% in 35 min) | Yes (54% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:50 h | 1:20 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:00 h | 19:04 h |
| Video Playback | 11:18 h | 25:00 h |
| Games | 04:38 h | 10:24 h |
| Standby Mode | 86 h | 107 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 25 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 5288x3968 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (720p) | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 123 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 25 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Depth: 5 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 25 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX576 | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.78 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 0.9 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 200 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | n/a | 70 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.5 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 25 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6024x4024 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 0.9 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 | GSM 850/900/1800MHz |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B800/B850/B900/B1700/B1800/B1900/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B66) |
| LTE category | 12 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | February, 2019 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2019 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 395 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 1299 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
