Samsung Galaxy A50 vs Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy A50 Manufactured in March, 2019, with display 6.4 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610, vs Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra, Manufactured in November, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A50
- Lighter design: 166g vs 218g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.9in
- Higher pixel density: 416ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.4 in | 6.9 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1200x2608 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 416 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 650 nits | 2000 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 480 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9 % | 91.9 % |
| Features | Always-On Display | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 141.5 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 119 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 7 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 158.5 mm (6.24 in) | 163.3 mm (6.43 in) |
| Width | 74.7 mm (2.94 in) | 77.8 mm (3.06 in) |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm (0.3 in) | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 166 g (5.86 oz) | 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP68 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue |
- White - Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Max Frequency | 2300 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.7 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.3 (Cortex-A73) |
6/3.63 () |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 840 |
| GPU Cores | 54 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| FLOPS | 91.8 GFLOPS | 3686.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 506 | 3553 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1550 | 10883 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 27420 |
| CPU | 83882 | 1163106 |
| GPU | 42251 | 1394796 |
| Memory | 58058 | 546277 |
| UX | 75732 | 761288 |
| NanoReview Score | 259923 | 3865467 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 44.5 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 97 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 4 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 746 | n/a |
| Writing score | 6360 | n/a |
| Web score | 4826 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5198 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5373 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 6024 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 11) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 22 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | One UI 3.1 | HyperOS 3 |
Battery
| Volume | 4000 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (40% in 35 min) | Yes (78% in 15 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:50 h | 0:39 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:00 h | 15:14 h |
| Video Playback | 11:18 h | 22:44 h |
| Games | 04:38 h | 08:06 h |
| Standby Mode | 86 h | 124 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 25 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 5288x3968 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 5x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (720p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 123 ° | 102 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 25 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Depth: 5 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 25 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX576 | Omnivision Light Hunter 950 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.78 | 1/1.31 (0.76) |
| Pixel size | 0.9 μm | 1.2 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/3.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 115 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.76 (0.36) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | 18 mm |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | 1/2.88 (0.35) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.61 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 25 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6024x4024 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/3.44 (0.29) |
| Pixel size | 0.9 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B800/B850/B900/B1700/B1800/B1900/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) | n/a |
| LTE category | 12 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | 2.1 |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | n/a |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | February, 2019 yr | November, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2019 yr | November, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 395 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 729 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 100 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0